From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Chris Wilson Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC xf86-video-intel 2/2] Add underscan properties Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 23:19:59 +0100 Message-ID: <1333059615_147779@CP5-2952> References: <1333056620-3548-1-git-send-email-przanoni@gmail.com> <1333056620-3548-2-git-send-email-przanoni@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from fireflyinternet.com (smtp.fireflyinternet.com [109.228.6.236]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B9199E733 for ; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 15:20:21 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1333056620-3548-2-git-send-email-przanoni@gmail.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: dri-devel-bounces+sf-dri-devel=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org Errors-To: dri-devel-bounces+sf-dri-devel=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org To: Paulo Zanoni , dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org Cc: Paulo Zanoni List-Id: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org On Thu, 29 Mar 2012 18:30:20 -0300, Paulo Zanoni wrote: > From: Paulo Zanoni > > In the Kernel side, these are crtc properties (since in the hardware, > underscan use the panel fitters, which are attached to the pipes). > Ideally we should make these as crtc properties too, but since xrandr > doesn't have support for them, we expose the atoms as output > properties. This is not the best solution, but making the kernel > underscan properties be output properties instead of crtc properties > would be even more wrong. However, we have set the precedent with panel fitting already and this is just a variation on that theme? My wish would be to be able describe the dst box of the framebuffer on the crtc as part of the mode. -Chris -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre