From: Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@gmail.com>
To: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: Ext4 Mailing List <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux FS Maling List <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Maling List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/8] ext2: write superblock only once on unmount
Date: Mon, 02 Apr 2012 16:44:09 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1333374249.22146.2.camel@sauron.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120331115332.GB4569@quack.suse.cz>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 760 bytes --]
On Sat, 2012-03-31 at 13:53 +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> On Wed 21-03-12 18:14:30, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
> > From: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com>
> >
> > Currently on unmount if we are mounted R/W, we first write the superblock to
> > the media if it is dirty, and then write it again, which is not optimal. This
> > patch makes ext2 write the superblock on unmount less times.
> Looks good. I've added the patch to my tree.
I would like to test v2 against your tree, I found this one:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jack/linux-fs.git
but I do not see this patch there - is that the right tree, or may be
you did not push out? Which branch should I use?
Thanks!
--
Best Regards,
Artem Bityutskiy
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-04-02 13:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-03-21 16:14 [PATCH v1 0/8] do not use s_dirt in ext2 Artem Bityutskiy
2012-03-21 16:14 ` [PATCH 1/8] mm: export dirty_writeback_interval Artem Bityutskiy
2012-03-21 16:14 ` [PATCH 2/8] VFS: remove unused superblock helpers Artem Bityutskiy
2012-03-21 16:14 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2012-03-21 16:14 ` [PATCH 3/8] ext2: write superblock only once on unmount Artem Bityutskiy
2012-03-31 11:53 ` Jan Kara
2012-04-02 13:44 ` Artem Bityutskiy [this message]
2012-04-02 22:10 ` Jan Kara
2012-03-21 16:14 ` [PATCH 4/8] ext2: intruduce ext2_mark_super_dirty Artem Bityutskiy
2012-03-21 16:14 ` [PATCH 5/8] ext2: introduce workqueue for superblock synchronization Artem Bityutskiy
2012-03-21 16:14 ` [PATCH 6/8] ext2: stop using VFS for dirty superblock management Artem Bityutskiy
2012-03-21 16:14 ` [PATCH 7/8] ext2: cleanup ext2_sync_super a bit Artem Bityutskiy
2012-03-21 16:14 ` [PATCH 8/8] ext2: introduce own superblock dirty flag Artem Bityutskiy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1333374249.22146.2.camel@sauron.fi.intel.com \
--to=dedekind1@gmail.com \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.