From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754159Ab2DCDDR (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Apr 2012 23:03:17 -0400 Received: from perches-mx.perches.com ([206.117.179.246]:54711 "EHLO labridge.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751131Ab2DCDDQ (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Apr 2012 23:03:16 -0400 Message-ID: <1333422195.26079.8.camel@joe2Laptop> Subject: Re: [PATCH] printk(): add KERN_CONT where needed From: Joe Perches To: Kay Sievers Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Len Brown Date: Mon, 02 Apr 2012 20:03:15 -0700 In-Reply-To: References: <1333415903.860.0.camel@mop> <1333420612.26079.6.camel@joe2Laptop> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.2- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2012-04-03 at 05:00 +0200, Kay Sievers wrote: > I just > trivially added the obviously missing prefix, which solved the > problem, and which could be applied right away. Actually, you didn't solve any problem. You just made it less likely to be interleaved against any other bare printk. But there are still _thousands_ of bare printks.