From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753644Ab2DEFtO (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Apr 2012 01:49:14 -0400 Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:58585 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750882Ab2DEFtN (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Apr 2012 01:49:13 -0400 Message-ID: <1333604949.7783.76.camel@marge.simpson.net> Subject: Re: [patch] cgroups: disallow attaching kthreadd From: Mike Galbraith To: David Rientjes Cc: Tejun Heo , Peter Zijlstra , Paul Menage , LKML , Li Zefan Date: Thu, 05 Apr 2012 07:49:09 +0200 In-Reply-To: References: <1333475906.7439.7.camel@marge.simpson.net> <1333535915.7188.18.camel@marge.simpson.net> <1333542649.7188.40.camel@marge.simpson.net> <20120404230922.GC2173@dhcp-172-17-108-109.mtv.corp.google.com> <1333601231.7783.31.camel@marge.simpson.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2012-04-04 at 21:58 -0700, David Rientjes wrote: > On Thu, 5 Apr 2012, Mike Galbraith wrote: > > > Below is user interface only patchlet. I find it cleaner than the > > cpuset,cpu variant, but don't have strong feelings either way. > > > > If this one don't fly, I'll just declare buglet immortal, he ain't worth > > near the electrons he's already wasted ;-) > > > > Why can't you simply propose the cpusets version that both Paul and I > liked? There's _no_ reason to do this for every cgroup, current or > future. I submitted that, and it didn't fly. I like the generic exclusion better, so I submit that for consideration. >>From my POV, the problem is known, decision makers can decide any way they want, but _I_ have posted my last variant. If this one doesn't fly, too bad for patchlet, it's not the first one to ever go splat :) -Mike