From: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
To: "John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>
Cc: Lauro Ramos Venancio <lauro.venancio@openbossa.org>,
Aloisio Almeida Jr <aloisio.almeida@openbossa.org>,
Ilan Elias <ilane@ti.com>,
Eric Lapuyade <eric.lapuyade@linux.intel.com>,
linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH 07/18] NFC: The core part should generate the target index
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 19:43:09 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1334079800-10671-8-git-send-email-sameo@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1334079800-10671-1-git-send-email-sameo@linux.intel.com>
The target index can be used by userspace to uniquely identify a target
and thus should be kept unique, per NFC adapter. Moreover, some protocols
do not provide a logical index when discovering new targets, so we have to
generate one for them.
For NCI or pn533 to fetch their logical index, we added a logical_idx field
to the target structure.
Signed-off-by: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
---
include/net/nfc/nfc.h | 2 ++
net/nfc/core.c | 5 +++++
net/nfc/nci/core.c | 2 +-
net/nfc/nci/ntf.c | 11 ++++++-----
net/nfc/rawsock.c | 6 ++++++
5 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/net/nfc/nfc.h b/include/net/nfc/nfc.h
index 431a6c5..45f0563 100644
--- a/include/net/nfc/nfc.h
+++ b/include/net/nfc/nfc.h
@@ -79,6 +79,7 @@ struct nfc_target {
u8 sensf_res_len;
u8 sensf_res[NFC_SENSF_RES_MAXSIZE];
u8 hci_reader_gate;
+ u8 logical_idx;
};
struct nfc_genl_data {
@@ -88,6 +89,7 @@ struct nfc_genl_data {
struct nfc_dev {
unsigned idx;
+ unsigned target_idx;
struct nfc_target *targets;
int n_targets;
int targets_generation;
diff --git a/net/nfc/core.c b/net/nfc/core.c
index deb4721..d924000 100644
--- a/net/nfc/core.c
+++ b/net/nfc/core.c
@@ -428,10 +428,15 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(nfc_alloc_recv_skb);
int nfc_targets_found(struct nfc_dev *dev,
struct nfc_target *targets, int n_targets)
{
+ int i;
+
pr_debug("dev_name=%s n_targets=%d\n", dev_name(&dev->dev), n_targets);
dev->polling = false;
+ for (i = 0; i < n_targets; i++)
+ targets[i].idx = dev->target_idx++;
+
spin_lock_bh(&dev->targets_lock);
dev->targets_generation++;
diff --git a/net/nfc/nci/core.c b/net/nfc/nci/core.c
index 9ec065b..8737c20 100644
--- a/net/nfc/nci/core.c
+++ b/net/nfc/nci/core.c
@@ -477,7 +477,7 @@ static int nci_activate_target(struct nfc_dev *nfc_dev, __u32 target_idx,
}
if (atomic_read(&ndev->state) == NCI_W4_HOST_SELECT) {
- param.rf_discovery_id = target->idx;
+ param.rf_discovery_id = target->logical_idx;
if (protocol == NFC_PROTO_JEWEL)
param.rf_protocol = NCI_RF_PROTOCOL_T1T;
diff --git a/net/nfc/nci/ntf.c b/net/nfc/nci/ntf.c
index 2e3dee4..99e1632 100644
--- a/net/nfc/nci/ntf.c
+++ b/net/nfc/nci/ntf.c
@@ -227,7 +227,7 @@ static void nci_add_new_target(struct nci_dev *ndev,
for (i = 0; i < ndev->n_targets; i++) {
target = &ndev->targets[i];
- if (target->idx == ntf->rf_discovery_id) {
+ if (target->logical_idx == ntf->rf_discovery_id) {
/* This target already exists, add the new protocol */
nci_add_new_protocol(ndev, target, ntf->rf_protocol,
ntf->rf_tech_and_mode,
@@ -248,10 +248,10 @@ static void nci_add_new_target(struct nci_dev *ndev,
ntf->rf_tech_and_mode,
&ntf->rf_tech_specific_params);
if (!rc) {
- target->idx = ntf->rf_discovery_id;
+ target->logical_idx = ntf->rf_discovery_id;
ndev->n_targets++;
- pr_debug("target_idx %d, n_targets %d\n", target->idx,
+ pr_debug("logical idx %d, n_targets %d\n", target->logical_idx,
ndev->n_targets);
}
}
@@ -372,10 +372,11 @@ static void nci_target_auto_activated(struct nci_dev *ndev,
if (rc)
return;
- target->idx = ntf->rf_discovery_id;
+ target->logical_idx = ntf->rf_discovery_id;
ndev->n_targets++;
- pr_debug("target_idx %d, n_targets %d\n", target->idx, ndev->n_targets);
+ pr_debug("logical idx %d, n_targets %d\n",
+ target->logical_idx, ndev->n_targets);
nfc_targets_found(ndev->nfc_dev, ndev->targets, ndev->n_targets);
}
diff --git a/net/nfc/rawsock.c b/net/nfc/rawsock.c
index 5a839ce..b2825aa 100644
--- a/net/nfc/rawsock.c
+++ b/net/nfc/rawsock.c
@@ -92,6 +92,12 @@ static int rawsock_connect(struct socket *sock, struct sockaddr *_addr,
goto error;
}
+ if (addr->target_idx > dev->target_idx - 1 ||
+ addr->target_idx < dev->target_idx - dev->n_targets) {
+ rc = -EINVAL;
+ goto error;
+ }
+
rc = nfc_activate_target(dev, addr->target_idx, addr->nfc_protocol);
if (rc)
goto put_dev;
--
1.7.9.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-04-10 17:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-04-10 17:43 [PATCH 00/18] NFC changes for 3.5 Samuel Ortiz
2012-04-10 17:43 ` [PATCH 01/18 3.4] NFC: Fix the LLCP Tx fragmentation loop Samuel Ortiz
2012-04-10 17:43 ` [PATCH 02/18] NFC: Add a target lost netlink event Samuel Ortiz
2012-04-10 17:43 ` [PATCH 03/18] NFC: Export target lost function Samuel Ortiz
2012-04-10 17:43 ` [PATCH 04/18] NFC: HCI support Samuel Ortiz
2012-04-10 17:43 ` [PATCH 05/18] NFC: SHDLC implementation Samuel Ortiz
2012-04-10 17:43 ` [PATCH 06/18] NFC: Add HCI documentation Samuel Ortiz
2012-04-10 17:43 ` Samuel Ortiz [this message]
2012-04-10 17:43 ` [PATCH 08/18] NFC: Fix next target_idx type and rename for clarity Samuel Ortiz
2012-04-10 17:43 ` [PATCH 09/18] NFC: Changed target activated state logic Samuel Ortiz
2012-04-10 17:43 ` [PATCH 10/18] NFC: Add Core support to generate tag lost event Samuel Ortiz
2012-04-10 17:43 ` [PATCH 11/18] NFC: Dump LLCP frames Samuel Ortiz
2012-04-10 17:43 ` [PATCH 12/18] NFC: No need to apply twice the modulo op to LLCP's recv_n Samuel Ortiz
2012-04-10 17:43 ` [PATCH 13/18] NFC: Fix LLCP TLV building routine Samuel Ortiz
2012-04-10 17:43 ` [PATCH 14/18] NFC: Call llcp_add_header properly when sending LLCP DM or DISC Samuel Ortiz
2012-04-10 17:43 ` [PATCH 15/18] NFC: Convert pn533 from tasklet to workqueues Samuel Ortiz
2012-04-10 17:43 ` [PATCH 16/18] NFC: pn533 Rx chaining support Samuel Ortiz
2012-04-10 17:43 ` [PATCH 17/18] NFC: Add MIUX to the local LLCP general bytes Samuel Ortiz
2012-04-10 17:43 ` [PATCH 18/18] NFC: Fix LLCP link timeout typo Samuel Ortiz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1334079800-10671-8-git-send-email-sameo@linux.intel.com \
--to=sameo@linux.intel.com \
--cc=aloisio.almeida@openbossa.org \
--cc=eric.lapuyade@linux.intel.com \
--cc=ilane@ti.com \
--cc=lauro.venancio@openbossa.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.