From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from 93-97-173-237.zone5.bethere.co.uk ([93.97.173.237] helo=tim.rpsys.net) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SHhbM-0004EI-Dd for bitbake-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 22:23:44 +0200 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q3AKEOjv032093; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 21:14:24 +0100 Received: from tim.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tim.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 31128-10; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 21:14:20 +0100 (BST) Received: from [192.168.3.10] ([192.168.3.10]) (authenticated bits=0) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q3AKEFio032086 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 10 Apr 2012 21:14:17 +0100 Message-ID: <1334088855.10826.36.camel@ted> From: Richard Purdie To: Khem Raj Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 21:14:15 +0100 In-Reply-To: References: <4F82DE2E.30208@mlbassoc.com> <4F845B40.2040302@mvista.com> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.2- Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rpsys.net Cc: Chris Larson , bitbake-devel@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: bblayers.conf is required? X-BeenThere: bitbake-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 20:23:44 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Tue, 2012-04-10 at 09:54 -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > > Yeah, bitbake itself doesn't require bblayers.conf. > > right. I forgot about bitbake's life without OE :) Its a backwards compatibility thing. When we implemented bblayers.conf we left it backwards compatible with what went before. It will work if BBPATH is set such that it can find a conf/bitbake.conf . Cheers, Richard