From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Chris Wilson Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] drm/i915: hide (seqno-1) in ringbuffer code Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 19:43:48 +0100 Message-ID: <1334169833_371240@CP5-2952> References: <1334168301-4699-1-git-send-email-ben@bwidawsk.net> <1334168301-4699-3-git-send-email-ben@bwidawsk.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from fireflyinternet.com (smtp.fireflyinternet.com [109.228.6.236]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B41329EB5D for ; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 11:44:00 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1334168301-4699-3-git-send-email-ben@bwidawsk.net> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Cc: Ben Widawsky , Ben Widawsky List-Id: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org On Wed, 11 Apr 2012 11:18:21 -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote: > Waiting for seqno-1 in our object synchronization code is an > implementation detail given how we've decided to do the waits within the > rest of our code. > > Requested-by: Daniel Vetter > Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky Thanks for the comment, I had forgotten about that hw detail. Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson -Chris -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre