From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Dario Faggioli <raistlin@linux.it>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06 of 10 [RFC]] xl: Allow user to set or
 change node affinity on-line
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 23:57:23 +0200
Message-ID: <1334267843.2417.4.camel@Abyss>
References: <patchbomb.1334150267@Solace>
	<64547b45cb112a35d3a2.1334150273@Solace>
	<4F86AE89.7020801@eu.citrix.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============6839869417137713039=="
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org>
In-Reply-To: <4F86AE89.7020801@eu.citrix.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
To: George Dunlap <george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com>
Cc: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@amd.com>, Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com>, Stefano Stabellini <Stefano.Stabellini@eu.citrix.com>, Juergen Gross <juergen.gross@ts.fujitsu.com>, Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com>, "xen-devel@lists.xen.org" <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org


--===============6839869417137713039==
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature";
	boundary="=-wu2aRXSvlm9yoLeuhH9n"


--=-wu2aRXSvlm9yoLeuhH9n
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Thu, 2012-04-12 at 11:29 +0100, George Dunlap wrote:=20
> > Of course this is not going to be equally effective, as it will
> > only affect future memory allocations without touching what's
> > already there. However, in future we might want to change this,
> > and use this as an interface for sort-of manual "domain node
> > migration".
> I think this is a good idea.
>=20
That is always something nice to hear. :-)

> I think if you take my suggestion to rework the previous patch into=20
> hypervisor, libxc, and libxl components, you should also move the xl=20
> stuff out of that patch and into this one (so that the xl and libxl=20
> changes relating to node affinity are each in their own patches).
>
Sounds reasonable, I sure will do that.

Thanks,
Dario

--=20
<<This happens because I choose it to happen!>> (Raistlin Majere)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://retis.sssup.it/people/faggioli
Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK)



--=-wu2aRXSvlm9yoLeuhH9n
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEABECAAYFAk+HT8MACgkQk4XaBE3IOsSuBgCfTBWw+hGj5pHC0Ql8k9jzV8gK
cO0An2p59Rhm7FKvsNFfI7gnBHmgXGAp
=15W/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-wu2aRXSvlm9yoLeuhH9n--



--===============6839869417137713039==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

--===============6839869417137713039==--