From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: "Chen, Dennis (SRDC SW)" <Dennis1.Chen@amd.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
"paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@ghostprotocols.net>
Subject: Re: A quick view of the performance benchmark for semaphore-like and mutex
Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2012 12:09:43 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1334657383.28150.78.camel@twins> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <491D6B4EAD0A714894D8AD22F4BDE043B15DCF@SCYBEXDAG03.amd.com>
On Tue, 2012-04-17 at 09:36 +0000, Chen, Dennis (SRDC SW) wrote:
> Just as a quick & rough test, with below changes based on mutex (almost the same as semaphore):
>
> --- /home/dennis/Linux/linux-3.3.2-sem/kernel/mutex.c 2012-04-17 14:59:49.823177615 +0800
> +++ ./mutex.c 2012-04-17 17:00:12.963059284 +0800
> @@ -140,6 +140,7 @@ __mutex_lock_common(struct mutex *lock,
> preempt_disable();
> mutex_acquire_nest(&lock->dep_map, subclass, 0, nest_lock, ip);
>
> +#if 0
> #ifdef CONFIG_MUTEX_SPIN_ON_OWNER
> /*
> * Optimistic spinning.
> @@ -195,6 +196,7 @@ __mutex_lock_common(struct mutex *lock,
> arch_mutex_cpu_relax();
> }
> #endif
> +#endif
> spin_lock_mutex(&lock->wait_lock, flags);
>
> debug_mutex_lock_common(lock, &waiter);
or you do:
echo NO_OWNER_SPIN > /debug/sched_features
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-04-17 10:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-04-17 9:36 A quick view of the performance benchmark for semaphore-like and mutex Chen, Dennis (SRDC SW)
2012-04-17 10:09 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2012-04-17 10:12 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-04-17 11:52 ` Chen, Dennis (SRDC SW)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1334657383.28150.78.camel@twins \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=Dennis1.Chen@amd.com \
--cc=acme@ghostprotocols.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.