All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
To: "Hatle, Mark" <mark.hatle@windriver.com>
Cc: yocto <yocto@yoctoproject.org>
Subject: Re: A question about PACKAGE_ARCH renaming
Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 13:55:48 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1334753748.24091.93.camel@ted> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <C3CEA23F-CADF-4127-AFBE-191B2CE602BC@windriver.com>

On Wed, 2012-04-18 at 12:45 +0000, Hatle, Mark wrote:
> There is/was a conversion that changed - to _ in the package arch.  And yes this needs to be fixed ASAP.

Let put this really simply. We are not doing this just as the -rc4 is
about to build. If we want to start considering a change like this we
might as well abort the release, start again and slip four weeks.

Why? That dash syntax works fine in opkg and is in use in real world
opkg feeds. This appears to be an rpm only issue. It also only appears
to be directly affecting hob right at this point.

When we filtered MACHINE people complained a lot. When we filtered
MACHINE_ARCH there were more complaints. If you just put the filtering
straight onto PACKAGE_ARCH as well, there will be immense trouble as it
will badly break Angstrom for a start :(.

I'd ask people think about what they're proposing and put it into
perspective.

I believe Dongxiao has a patch which would allow us to work around the
issue in hob for this release and then we can re-assess this issue in
1.3. I suspect the fix is going to be to drop the name mangling in the
core and move it to be specific to rpm.

Cheers,

Richard






  reply	other threads:[~2012-04-18 12:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-04-17  1:01 A question about PACKAGE_ARCH renaming Xu, Dongxiao
2012-04-17  6:43 ` Samuel Stirtzel
2012-04-17  6:49   ` Samuel Stirtzel
2012-04-17 15:37   ` Mark Hatle
2012-04-17 15:02 ` Xu, Dongxiao
2012-04-17 15:35 ` Mark Hatle
2012-04-18  0:38   ` Xu, Dongxiao
2012-04-18  5:20     ` Xu, Dongxiao
2012-04-18 12:45       ` Hatle, Mark
2012-04-18 12:55         ` Richard Purdie [this message]
2012-04-18 13:09           ` Xu, Dongxiao
2012-04-18 13:25           ` Hatle, Mark

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1334753748.24091.93.camel@ted \
    --to=richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=mark.hatle@windriver.com \
    --cc=yocto@yoctoproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.