From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.gna.ch (darkcity.gna.ch [195.226.6.51]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDB21B6F6E for ; Wed, 18 Apr 2012 23:03:01 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <1334754160.5989.305.camel@thor.local> Subject: Re: PowerPC radeon KMS - is it possible? From: Michel =?ISO-8859-1?Q?D=E4nzer?= To: Andreas Schwab Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 15:02:40 +0200 In-Reply-To: References: <1334730915.5989.265.camel__41553.0639271767$1334731329$gmane$org@thor.local> <1334735555.5989.272.camel@thor.local> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: o jordan , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Mit, 2012-04-18 at 13:25 +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote:=20 > Michel D=C3=A4nzer writes: >=20 > > On Mit, 2012-04-18 at 09:42 +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote:=20 > >> Michel D=C3=A4nzer writes: > >>=20 > >> > Not sure it's a good idea to set both of these =3Dy: It will prevent= the > >> > radeon driver from initializing at all by default if radeonfb is act= ive. > >>=20 > >> You can say video=3Dradeonfb:off. > > > > I know, I'm referring to the default behaviour without any relevant > > kernel command line options. >=20 > Which is exactly the right behaviour for me. You do understand that 'prevent the radeon driver from initializing at all' means direct rendering won't work at all, even with older Mesa drivers? --=20 Earthling Michel D=C3=A4nzer | http://www.amd.c= om Libre software enthusiast | Debian, X and DRI developer