From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: axboe@kernel.dk
Cc: vgoyal@redhat.com, ctalbott@google.com, rni@google.com,
cgroups@vger.kernel.org, containers@lists.linux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 4/4] blkcg: use radix tree to index blkgs from blkcg
Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2012 16:29:24 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1334878164-24788-5-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1334878164-24788-1-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org>
blkg lookup is currently performed by traversing linked list anchored
at blkcg->blkg_list. This is very unscalable and with blk-throttle
enabled and enough request queues on the system, this can get very
ugly quickly (blk-throttle performs look up on every bio submission).
This patch makes blkcg use radix tree to index blkgs combined with
simple last-looked-up hint. This is mostly identical to how icqs are
indexed from ioc.
Note that because __blkg_lookup() may be invoked without holding queue
lock, hint is only updated from __blkg_lookup_create(). Due to cfq's
cfqq caching, this makes hint updates overly lazy. This will be
improved with scheduled blkcg aware request allocation.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
---
block/blk-cgroup.c | 52 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
block/blk-cgroup.h | 6 ++++++
2 files changed, 50 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/block/blk-cgroup.c b/block/blk-cgroup.c
index 30a7a9c..02cf633 100644
--- a/block/blk-cgroup.c
+++ b/block/blk-cgroup.c
@@ -142,11 +142,21 @@ static struct blkcg_gq *__blkg_lookup(struct blkcg *blkcg,
struct request_queue *q)
{
struct blkcg_gq *blkg;
- struct hlist_node *n;
- hlist_for_each_entry_rcu(blkg, n, &blkcg->blkg_list, blkcg_node)
- if (blkg->q == q)
- return blkg;
+ blkg = rcu_dereference(blkcg->blkg_hint);
+ if (blkg && blkg->q == q)
+ return blkg;
+
+ /*
+ * Hint didn't match. Look up from the radix tree. Note that we
+ * may not be holding queue_lock and thus are not sure whether
+ * @blkg from blkg_tree has already been removed or not, so we
+ * can't update hint to the lookup result. Leave it to the caller.
+ */
+ blkg = radix_tree_lookup(&blkcg->blkg_tree, q->id);
+ if (blkg && blkg->q == q)
+ return blkg;
+
return NULL;
}
@@ -179,9 +189,12 @@ static struct blkcg_gq *__blkg_lookup_create(struct blkcg *blkcg,
WARN_ON_ONCE(!rcu_read_lock_held());
lockdep_assert_held(q->queue_lock);
+ /* lookup and update hint on success, see __blkg_lookup() for details */
blkg = __blkg_lookup(blkcg, q);
- if (blkg)
+ if (blkg) {
+ rcu_assign_pointer(blkcg->blkg_hint, blkg);
return blkg;
+ }
/* blkg holds a reference to blkcg */
if (!css_tryget(&blkcg->css))
@@ -194,12 +207,24 @@ static struct blkcg_gq *__blkg_lookup_create(struct blkcg *blkcg,
goto err_put;
/* insert */
+ ret = radix_tree_preload(GFP_ATOMIC);
+ if (ret)
+ goto err_free;
+
spin_lock(&blkcg->lock);
- hlist_add_head_rcu(&blkg->blkcg_node, &blkcg->blkg_list);
- list_add(&blkg->q_node, &q->blkg_list);
+ ret = radix_tree_insert(&blkcg->blkg_tree, q->id, blkg);
+ if (likely(!ret)) {
+ hlist_add_head_rcu(&blkg->blkcg_node, &blkcg->blkg_list);
+ list_add(&blkg->q_node, &q->blkg_list);
+ }
spin_unlock(&blkcg->lock);
- return blkg;
+ radix_tree_preload_end();
+
+ if (!ret)
+ return blkg;
+err_free:
+ blkg_free(blkg);
err_put:
css_put(&blkcg->css);
return ERR_PTR(ret);
@@ -229,10 +254,20 @@ static void blkg_destroy(struct blkcg_gq *blkg)
/* Something wrong if we are trying to remove same group twice */
WARN_ON_ONCE(list_empty(&blkg->q_node));
WARN_ON_ONCE(hlist_unhashed(&blkg->blkcg_node));
+
+ radix_tree_delete(&blkcg->blkg_tree, blkg->q->id);
list_del_init(&blkg->q_node);
hlist_del_init_rcu(&blkg->blkcg_node);
/*
+ * Both setting lookup hint to and clearing it from @blkg are done
+ * under queue_lock. If it's not pointing to @blkg now, it never
+ * will. Hint assignment itself can race safely.
+ */
+ if (rcu_dereference_raw(blkcg->blkg_hint) == blkg)
+ rcu_assign_pointer(blkcg->blkg_hint, NULL);
+
+ /*
* Put the reference taken at the time of creation so that when all
* queues are gone, group can be destroyed.
*/
@@ -593,6 +628,7 @@ static struct cgroup_subsys_state *blkcg_create(struct cgroup *cgroup)
blkcg->id = atomic64_inc_return(&id_seq); /* root is 0, start from 1 */
done:
spin_lock_init(&blkcg->lock);
+ INIT_RADIX_TREE(&blkcg->blkg_tree, GFP_ATOMIC);
INIT_HLIST_HEAD(&blkcg->blkg_list);
return &blkcg->css;
diff --git a/block/blk-cgroup.h b/block/blk-cgroup.h
index 44cb908..8ac457c 100644
--- a/block/blk-cgroup.h
+++ b/block/blk-cgroup.h
@@ -16,6 +16,7 @@
#include <linux/cgroup.h>
#include <linux/u64_stats_sync.h>
#include <linux/seq_file.h>
+#include <linux/radix-tree.h>
/* Max limits for throttle policy */
#define THROTL_IOPS_MAX UINT_MAX
@@ -37,9 +38,14 @@ enum blkg_rwstat_type {
BLKG_RWSTAT_TOTAL = BLKG_RWSTAT_NR,
};
+struct blkcg_gq;
+
struct blkcg {
struct cgroup_subsys_state css;
spinlock_t lock;
+
+ struct radix_tree_root blkg_tree;
+ struct blkcg_gq *blkg_hint;
struct hlist_head blkg_list;
/* for policies to test whether associated blkcg has changed */
--
1.7.7.3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-04-19 23:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-04-19 23:29 [PATCHSET] block: fixes for long standing issues Tejun Heo
2012-04-19 23:29 ` Tejun Heo
[not found] ` <1334878164-24788-1-git-send-email-tj-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
2012-04-19 23:29 ` [PATCH 1/4] block: collapse blk_alloc_request() into get_request() Tejun Heo
2012-04-19 23:29 ` Tejun Heo
2012-04-19 23:29 ` Tejun Heo
2012-04-19 23:29 ` [PATCH 2/4] block: fix elvpriv allocation failure handling Tejun Heo
2012-04-19 23:29 ` Tejun Heo
2012-04-19 23:29 ` Tejun Heo
2012-04-19 23:29 ` [PATCH 3/4] blkcg: fix blkcg->css ref leak in __blkg_lookup_create() Tejun Heo
2012-04-19 23:29 ` Tejun Heo
2012-04-19 23:29 ` [PATCH 4/4] blkcg: use radix tree to index blkgs from blkcg Tejun Heo
2012-04-20 8:10 ` [PATCHSET] block: fixes for long standing issues Jens Axboe
2012-04-20 8:10 ` Jens Axboe
2012-04-19 23:29 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
[not found] ` <1334878164-24788-5-git-send-email-tj-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
2012-04-20 17:26 ` [PATCH 4/4] blkcg: use radix tree to index blkgs from blkcg Vivek Goyal
2012-04-20 17:26 ` Vivek Goyal
2012-04-20 17:26 ` Vivek Goyal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1334878164-24788-5-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=containers@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ctalbott@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rni@google.com \
--cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.