From: Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@gmail.com>
To: Jean-Christophe DUBOIS <jcd@tribudubois.net>
Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [JFFS2] check xattr data integrity during the scan.
Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2012 16:15:58 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1335100558.28267.11.camel@brekeke> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1334175816-20688-1-git-send-email-jcd@tribudubois.net>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1297 bytes --]
On Wed, 2012-04-11 at 22:23 +0200, Jean-Christophe DUBOIS wrote:
> If the system was powered off while JFFS2 was creating or moving
> (GC) an extended attribute node, it might happen at next reboot
> that the node CRC is OK but the data (name and value) might be
> incomplete and therefore corrupted.
>
> During the mount scan we need to check the xattr data integrity to
> weed out bad ones and keep good ones (whith an earlier version).
>
> Whitout this check the xattr data integrity problem was detected
> a lot later and was not cured automatically (-EIO was returned).
>
> Signed-off-by: Jean-Christophe DUBOIS <jcd@tribudubois.net>
> ---
AFAIR, the whole idea of having 2 CRC checksums in JFFS2 nodes is to
speed up scanning. E.g., if we hit an inode node, we check only
"node_crc" to validate the "metadata", insert the inode to the in-memory
data structures, and read the next node. We do not check the data CRC
(data_crc), otherwise scanning would be much slower. If the data are
corrupted, we notice this later, wen reading it.
The same is done for xattrs - during scanning we do not check the data
payload.
I do not say this is ideal design, but it is how it is. So I do not
think your patch should be merged.
--
Best Regards,
Artem Bityutskiy
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-04-22 13:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-04-11 20:23 [PATCH] [JFFS2] check xattr data integrity during the scan Jean-Christophe DUBOIS
2012-04-22 13:04 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2012-04-22 13:15 ` Artem Bityutskiy [this message]
2012-04-22 16:17 ` Jean-Christophe DUBOIS
2012-04-25 13:55 ` Artem Bityutskiy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1335100558.28267.11.camel@brekeke \
--to=dedekind1@gmail.com \
--cc=jcd@tribudubois.net \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.