From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@gmail.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 2/3] math128: Introduce {mult,add,cmp}_u128
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 21:43:02 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1335296582.28150.227.camel@twins> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+55aFyvBTDh_DkXs6Z6zFmjyYxvWaAEm9-rJDXhvPx8CpDiKA@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, 2012-04-24 at 12:37 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> Or at least stupid.
>
I'll take stupid.. this bit-fiddling isn't something I've done lots of.
I'll go stare at gcc output now.. ;-)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-04-24 19:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-04-24 16:10 [RFC][PATCH 0/3] gcc work-around and math128 Peter Zijlstra
2012-04-24 16:10 ` [RFC][PATCH 1/3] kernel,sched,time: Clean up gcc work-arounds Peter Zijlstra
2012-04-24 19:39 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-04-25 0:14 ` Stephen Rothwell
2012-04-24 16:10 ` [RFC][PATCH 2/3] math128: Introduce {mult,add,cmp}_u128 Peter Zijlstra
2012-04-24 19:37 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-04-24 19:43 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2012-04-24 20:12 ` Måns Rullgård
2012-04-24 21:54 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-04-25 0:09 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-04-25 1:46 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-04-25 8:35 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-04-25 10:13 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-04-25 0:23 ` Stephen Rothwell
2012-04-25 8:11 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-04-25 11:23 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2012-04-25 11:58 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-04-25 14:35 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2012-04-25 15:09 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-04-24 16:10 ` [RFC][PATCH 3/3] math128, x86_64: Implement {mult,add}_u128 in 64bit asm Peter Zijlstra
2012-04-24 16:34 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-04-24 16:36 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-04-24 17:17 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-04-24 17:19 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-04-24 17:20 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-04-24 22:00 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-04-24 22:03 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-04-24 17:22 ` [RFC][PATCH 0/3] gcc work-around and math128 H. Peter Anvin
2012-04-24 17:27 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-04-24 21:15 ` Andy Lutomirski
2012-04-24 21:18 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-04-24 21:32 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-04-24 21:35 ` Andy Lutomirski
2012-04-24 21:51 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1335296582.28150.227.camel@twins \
--to=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=juri.lelli@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.