From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from 93-97-173-237.zone5.bethere.co.uk ([93.97.173.237] helo=tim.rpsys.net) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SNUYL-0005Hj-ER for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 26 Apr 2012 21:40:33 +0200 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q3QJUu60006760 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2012 20:30:56 +0100 Received: from tim.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tim.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 06700-01 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2012 20:30:52 +0100 (BST) Received: from [192.168.3.10] ([192.168.3.10]) (authenticated bits=0) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q3QJUi7K006739 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2012 20:30:45 +0100 Message-ID: <1335468645.20130.27.camel@ted> From: Richard Purdie To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2012 20:30:45 +0100 In-Reply-To: <1335451639.20130.18.camel@ted> References: <1335451639.20130.18.camel@ted> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.2- Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rpsys.net Subject: Re: gcc 4.7 + mips64 architecture support X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2012 19:40:33 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Thu, 2012-04-26 at 15:47 +0100, Richard Purdie wrote: > On Wed, 2012-04-25 at 16:31 -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > > Hello > > > > Now that release is almost out of door. I would like some eyes on the > > gcc-4.7 work > > and mips64 architecture support that I have done meanwhile > > > > I have made sure that gcc-4.6 still keeps working and I have patches > > for gcc-4.5 too > > for meta-oe too. I have repeatedly built core-image-sato and > > core-image-minimal for uclibc/eglibc > > but more coverage would be nicer. > > > > The patches are posted here > > > > http://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core-contrib/log/?h=kraj/misc > > > > I would appreciate any feedback or testing on this > > I had a look through the patch series. I've posted an altered version of > the class override patch. I've pulled the gcc 4.7 part into master-next, > have get gcc 4.7 as the default and am running it though the > autobuilder. That should see how we stand with our usual regression > tests. The builds shows the following failures (I've kept duplication so you can see the patterns). Not too bad considering: MACHINE=qemux86, failure in: gst-ffmpeg:do_configure http://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org:8010/builders/nightly-world/builds/66/steps/shell_24/logs/stdio MACHINE=qemuarm, failures in: clutter-1.8:do_configure glew:do_compile qt4-x11-free:do_compile http://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org:8010/builders/nightly-arm/builds/402/steps/shell_19/logs/stdio MACHINE=qemuppc, failures in: clutter-1.8:do_configure glew:do_compile qt4-x11-free:do_compile http://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org:8010/builders/nightly-ppc/builds/359/steps/shell_19/logs/stdio MACHINE=mpc8315e-rdb, failure in: mesa-dri:do_compile http://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org:8010/builders/nightly-ppc/builds/359/steps/shell_35/logs/stdio MACHINE=qemumips, failures in: clutter-1.8:do_configure glew:do_compile http://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org:8010/builders/nightly-mips/builds/371/steps/shell_19/logs/stdio MACHINE=beagleboard, failure in: mesa-dri:do_compile http://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org:8010/builders/nightly-arm/builds/402/steps/shell_35/logs/stdio MACHINE=routerstationpro, failure in: mesa-dri:do_compile http://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org:8010/builders/nightly-mips/builds/371/steps/shell_35/logs/stdio Also, adding meta-qt3 and building lsb targets with DISTRO=poky-lsb adds the failure: qt-x11-free:do_compile http://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org:8010/builders/nightly-ppc/builds/359/steps/shell_76/logs/stdio There will be more build failures but probably variations of the above on lsb builds but those haven't happened yet. Cheers, Richard