From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] config: enable lpm, port, table, pipeline,
	acl, sched libraries for ppc64le
Date: Sat, 09 Jul 2016 22:53:19 +0200
Message-ID: <13354717.T3ZIX32DYy@xps13>
References: <1467860276-22848-1-git-send-email-gowrishankar.m@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
 <2151416.pAYsFeuZ97@xps13> <57810C81.90807@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Chao Zhu <chaozhu@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
 Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>,
 Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>,
 Cristian Dumitrescu <cristian.dumitrescu@intel.com>, pradeep@us.ibm.com
To: gowrishankar <gowrishankar.m@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Return-path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from mail-wm0-f50.google.com (mail-wm0-f50.google.com [74.125.82.50])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7000C2170
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Sat,  9 Jul 2016 22:53:21 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by mail-wm0-f50.google.com with SMTP id f126so50391227wma.1
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Sat, 09 Jul 2016 13:53:21 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <57810C81.90807@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>

2016-07-09 20:08, gowrishankar:
> Hi Thomas,
> 
> On Friday 08 July 2016 06:27 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > The comment and these lines can be removed and rely on default 
> > enabling in config/common_base. I suggest to enable (remove disabling) 
> > a feature at a time in the patch fixing the feature for PPC. 
> 
> Sure. So, do you suggest to send individual patchset (or patch) for each 
> feature being enabled, one by one ?.

No, my comment was about dropping the patch #1 and update following patches.
Example: in the patch fixing LPM, you can remove the line disabling LPM
in the config file.