All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@gmail.com>
To: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung.kim@lge.com>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@ghostprotocols.net>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/13] perf evlist: Fix creation of cpu map
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2012 06:12:58 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1335474778.1497.14.camel@leonhard> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4F996433.7040003@gmail.com>

Hi,

2012-04-26 (Thu), 09:05 -0600, David Ahern wrote:
> On 4/25/12 11:15 PM, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> > Currently, 'perf record -- sleep 1' creates a cpu map for all online
> > cpus since it turns out calling cpu_map__new(NULL). Fix it. Also it
> > is guaranteed that cpu_list is NULL if PID/TID is given by calling
> > perf_target__validate(), so we can make the conditional bit simpler.
> >
> > This also fixes perf test 7 (Validate) failure on my 6 core machine:
> >
> >    $ cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/online
> >    0-11
> >    $ ./perf test -v 7
> >     7: Validate PERF_RECORD_* events&  perf_sample fields:
> >    --- start ---
> >    perf_evlist__mmap: Operation not permitted
> >    ---- end ----
> >    Validate PERF_RECORD_* events&  perf_sample fields: FAILED!
> 
> Works fine for me with latest tip:
> $ cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/online
> 0-15
> 
> $ /tmp/perf/perf test -v 7
>   7: Validate PERF_RECORD_* events & perf_sample fields:
> --- start ---
> 64740167922229 0 PERF_RECORD_SAMPLE
> 64740167926354 0 PERF_RECORD_SAMPLE
> 64740167928389 0 PERF_RECORD_SAMPLE
> 64740167930832 0 PERF_RECORD_SAMPLE
> 64740168404145 0 PERF_RECORD_COMM: sleep:16523
> 64740168424672 0 PERF_RECORD_MMAP 16523/16523: [0x400000(0x6000) @ 0]: 
> /bin/sleep
> 64740168441676 0 PERF_RECORD_MMAP 16523/16523: [0x7f83de5bb000(0x224000) 
> @ 0]: /lib64/ld-2.14.90.so
> 64740168458460 0 PERF_RECORD_MMAP 16523/16523: [0x7fff009ff000(0x1000) @ 
> 0x7fff009ff000]: [vdso]
> 64740168586358 0 PERF_RECORD_MMAP 16523/16523: [0x7f83de203000(0x3b8000) 
> @ 0]: /lib64/libc-2.14.90.so
> 64741168625653 0 PERF_RECORD_EXIT(16523:16523):(16523:16523)
> ---- end ----
> Validate PERF_RECORD_* events & perf_sample fields: Ok
> 
> Is the failure a by-product of the other patches in this set?
> 

Hmm.. No, I can reproduce it without any of this series. And now I think
that it is not related to the number of cpus. On my 4 core (no
hyperthreading) machine at home, the result was same.

BTW, did you change sysctl settings?

  $ cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/online 
  0-3
  $ grep . /proc/sys/kernel/perf_event_*
  /proc/sys/kernel/perf_event_max_sample_rate:100000
  /proc/sys/kernel/perf_event_mlock_kb:516
  /proc/sys/kernel/perf_event_paranoid:1
  $ ./perf test 7
   7: Validate PERF_RECORD_* events & perf_sample fields: FAILED!
  $ ./perf --version
  perf version 3.4.rc1


Thanks.

-- 
Regards,
Namhyung Kim



  reply	other threads:[~2012-04-26 21:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-04-26  5:15 [RFC PATCHSET 00/13] perf tools: Fix cpu/thread map handling v2 Namhyung Kim
2012-04-26  5:15 ` [PATCH 01/13] perf tools: Introduce struct perf_target Namhyung Kim
2012-05-11  6:27   ` [tip:perf/core] " tip-bot for Namhyung Kim
2012-04-26  5:15 ` [PATCH 02/13] perf stat: Convert to " Namhyung Kim
2012-05-11  6:28   ` [tip:perf/core] " tip-bot for Namhyung Kim
2012-04-26  5:15 ` [PATCH 03/13] perf top: " Namhyung Kim
2012-05-11  6:29   ` [tip:perf/core] " tip-bot for Namhyung Kim
2012-04-26  5:15 ` [PATCH 04/13] perf tools: Introduce perf_target__validate() helper Namhyung Kim
2012-05-11  6:30   ` [tip:perf/core] " tip-bot for Namhyung Kim
2012-04-26  5:15 ` [PATCH 05/13] perf tools: Make perf_evlist__create_maps() take struct perf_target Namhyung Kim
2012-05-11  6:31   ` [tip:perf/core] perf evlist: Make create_maps() " tip-bot for Namhyung Kim
2012-04-26  5:15 ` [PATCH 06/13] perf tools: Check more combinations of PID/TID, UID and CPU switches Namhyung Kim
2012-05-11  6:32   ` [tip:perf/core] " tip-bot for Namhyung Kim
2012-04-26  5:15 ` [PATCH 07/13] perf evlist: Fix creation of cpu map Namhyung Kim
2012-04-26 15:05   ` David Ahern
2012-04-26 21:12     ` Namhyung Kim [this message]
2012-04-26 21:22       ` David Ahern
2012-04-27  0:16         ` Namhyung Kim
2012-04-27 15:08           ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2012-04-27 15:32             ` David Ahern
2012-04-27 16:00               ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2012-04-27 16:05                 ` David Ahern
2012-04-27 16:09                   ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2012-05-02 18:40           ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2012-05-04  4:05             ` Namhyung Kim
2012-05-04 13:37               ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2012-05-04 13:53                 ` Namhyung Kim
2012-04-26  5:15 ` [PATCH 08/13] perf target: Split out perf_target handling code Namhyung Kim
2012-05-02 18:30   ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2012-05-03 14:39     ` Namhyung Kim
2012-05-03 15:27       ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2012-05-03 15:30         ` Namhyung Kim
2012-05-11  6:33   ` [tip:perf/core] " tip-bot for Namhyung Kim
2012-04-26  5:15 ` [PATCH 09/13] perf target: Introduce perf_target_errno Namhyung Kim
2012-05-02 18:59   ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2012-05-03 14:47     ` Namhyung Kim
2012-05-03 20:34     ` David Ahern
2012-05-03 20:42       ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2012-05-03 20:49         ` David Ahern
2012-04-26  5:15 ` [PATCH 10/13] perf target: Introduce perf_target__parse_uid() Namhyung Kim
2012-04-26  5:15 ` [PATCH 11/13] perf tools: Introduce perf_target__strerror() Namhyung Kim
2012-04-26  5:15 ` [PATCH 12/13] perf target: Consolidate target task/cpu checking Namhyung Kim
2012-04-26  5:15 ` [PATCH 13/13] perf stat: Use perf_evlist__create_maps Namhyung Kim

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1335474778.1497.14.camel@leonhard \
    --to=namhyung@gmail.com \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=acme@ghostprotocols.net \
    --cc=dsahern@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=namhyung.kim@lge.com \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.