From: Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@gmail.com>
To: Ted Tso <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: Linux Kernel Maling List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux FS Maling List <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
Ext4 Mailing List <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>,
Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] ext4: Remove useless marking of superblock dirty
Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2012 11:37:25 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1335775045.2584.3.camel@sauron.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1334215249.13842.36.camel@sauron.fi.intel.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 740 bytes --]
On Thu, 2012-04-12 at 10:20 +0300, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-04-02 at 14:45 +0300, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
> > From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
> >
> > Commit a0375156 properly notes that superblock doesn't need to be marked
> > as dirty when only number of free inodes / blocks / number of directories
> > changes since that is recomputed on each mount anyway. However that comment
> > leaves some unnecessary markings as dirty in place. Remove these.
> >
> > Artem: tested using xfstests for both journalled and non-journalled ext4.
>
> Hi Ted, what would be the fate of this patch-set?
Hi Ted, I am sorry for being annoying, but what do you think about these
patches?
--
Best Regards,
Artem Bityutskiy
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-04-30 8:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-04-02 11:45 [PATCH v2 0/4] do not use s_dirt in ext4 Artem Bityutskiy
2012-04-02 11:45 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] ext4: Remove useless marking of superblock dirty Artem Bityutskiy
2012-04-12 7:20 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2012-04-30 8:37 ` Artem Bityutskiy [this message]
2012-06-01 13:53 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2012-06-01 13:55 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2012-06-01 15:16 ` Ted Ts'o
2012-06-01 17:48 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2012-06-21 13:11 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2012-04-02 11:45 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] ext4: Convert last user of ext4_mark_super_dirty() to ext4_handle_dirty_super() Artem Bityutskiy
2012-04-02 11:45 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2012-04-02 11:45 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] ext4: remove unnecessary superblock dirtying Artem Bityutskiy
2012-04-02 21:49 ` Jan Kara
2012-04-02 11:45 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] ext4: weed out ext4_write_super Artem Bityutskiy
2012-04-02 21:50 ` Jan Kara
2012-05-18 10:25 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] do not use s_dirt in ext4 Artem Bityutskiy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1335775045.2584.3.camel@sauron.fi.intel.com \
--to=dedekind1@gmail.com \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.