From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
mingo@kernel.org, pjt@google.com, paul@paulmenage.org,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, rjw@sisk.pl, nacc@us.ibm.com,
paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, tglx@linutronix.de,
seto.hidetoshi@jp.fujitsu.com, rob@landley.net, tj@kernel.org,
mschmidt@redhat.com, berrange@redhat.com,
nikunj@linux.vnet.ibm.com, vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] CPU hotplug, cpusets: Fix issues with cpusets handling upon CPU hotplug
Date: Fri, 04 May 2012 23:34:25 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1336167265.6509.83.camel@twins> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120504212758.GC3054@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
On Fri, 2012-05-04 at 14:27 -0700, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
> > - if you retain it for cpuset but not others that's confusing (too);
>
> That's a good point.
>
> Related, possibly counter-example, and perhaps I'm wrong about it. When
> we hot-unplug a CPU, and a task's scheduler affinity (via
> sched_setaffinity) refers to that CPU only, do we kill that task? Can
> you sched_setaffinity a task to a CPU that is offline (alone or in a
> group of possible CPUs)? Or is it allowed to run anywhere? Do we destroy
> its affinity policy when that situation is run across?
See a few emails back, we destroy the affinity. Current cpuset behaviour
can be said to match that.
> Or do we restore the task to the CPU again when we re-plug it?
Nope that information is lost forever from the kernels pov.
Keeping this information around for the off-chance of needing it is
rather expensive (512 bytes per task for your regular distro kernel that
has NR_CPUS=4096).
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-05-04 21:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-05-04 19:17 [PATCH v2 0/7] CPU hotplug, cpusets: Fix issues with cpusets handling upon CPU hotplug Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-05-04 19:17 ` [PATCH v2 1/7] cpusets, hotplug: Implement cpuset tree traversal in a helper function Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-05-04 19:18 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] cpusets, hotplug: Restructure functions that are invoked during hotplug Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-05-04 19:18 ` [PATCH v2 3/7] cpusets: Introduce 'user_cpus_allowed' and rework the semantics of 'cpus_allowed' Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-05-04 19:19 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] CPU hotplug, cpusets: Workout hotplug handling for cpusets Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-05-04 19:19 ` [PATCH v2 5/7] Docs, cpusets: Update the cpuset documentation Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-05-04 22:28 ` Rob Landley
2012-05-04 19:20 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] cpusets: Optimize the implementation of guarantee_online_cpus() Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-05-04 19:20 ` [PATCH v2 7/7] cpusets: Remove out-dated comment about cpuset_track_online_cpus Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-05-04 19:24 ` [PATCH v2 0/7] CPU hotplug, cpusets: Fix issues with cpusets handling upon CPU hotplug Peter Zijlstra
2012-05-04 19:58 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-05-04 20:14 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-05-04 20:28 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-05-04 20:49 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2012-05-04 21:01 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-05-04 21:27 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2012-05-04 21:32 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-05-04 21:34 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2012-05-04 21:57 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2012-05-04 21:38 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-05-04 20:46 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2012-05-04 20:56 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-05-04 21:30 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2012-05-04 21:44 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-05-05 15:24 ` Alan Stern
2012-05-05 17:44 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-05-05 18:56 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-05-08 13:07 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2012-05-05 4:39 ` Mike Galbraith
2012-05-05 17:15 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-05-07 15:26 ` Jiang Liu
2012-05-09 9:12 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1336167265.6509.83.camel@twins \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=mschmidt@redhat.com \
--cc=nacc@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=nacc@us.ibm.com \
--cc=nikunj@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=paul@paulmenage.org \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=pjt@google.com \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=rob@landley.net \
--cc=seto.hidetoshi@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.