From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Dario Faggioli <raistlin@linux.it>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] libxl: use xc_topologyinfo to figure out
 how many CPUs we actually have
Date: Wed, 09 May 2012 13:11:38 +0200
Message-ID: <1336561898.2621.4.camel@Abyss>
References: <420c8861a2d2a61a7e80.1336561430@Solace>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============6894980105098005633=="
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org>
In-Reply-To: <420c8861a2d2a61a7e80.1336561430@Solace>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
To: xen-devel@lists.xen.org
Cc: George Dunlap <george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com>, Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com>, Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com>
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org


--===============6894980105098005633==
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature";
	boundary="=-f2O9odqswB6uANpHDu+T"


--=-f2O9odqswB6uANpHDu+T
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wed, 2012-05-09 at 13:03 +0200, Darrio Faggioli wrote:=20
> Within libxl_get_cpu_topology(), considering all the CPUs the hypervisor
> supports to be valid topology entries might lead to misleading and incorr=
ect
> behaviours, e.g., the output of `xl info -n' below on a 16 cores machine:
> ...
> <snip>
>=20
> However, xc_topologyinfo() tells us (in max_cpu_index) how many entries
> arrays it returns corresponds to actually valid CPUs, so let's use that
> information.
>=20
> Signed-off-by: Dario Faggioli <dario.faggioli@citrix.com>
>=20
And, as it is an actual bugfix and very very small in size, not to
forget that I'd need that for the NUMA placement series, I'm proposing
this for 4.2... Does it make sense?

Thanks and Regards,
Dario

--=20
<<This happens because I choose it to happen!>> (Raistlin Majere)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://retis.sssup.it/people/faggioli
Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK)



--=-f2O9odqswB6uANpHDu+T
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEABECAAYFAk+qUOoACgkQk4XaBE3IOsQN4ACfdpTC75rh8EY19S5jD95LadQU
oBEAnRfsCl2YfqilaTpVT3gPIOIN43sb
=yHgc
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-f2O9odqswB6uANpHDu+T--



--===============6894980105098005633==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

--===============6894980105098005633==--