From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from 93-97-173-237.zone5.bethere.co.uk ([93.97.173.237] helo=tim.rpsys.net) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SV80K-0006H6-VX for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 17 May 2012 23:13:01 +0200 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q4HL2urV031525; Thu, 17 May 2012 22:02:56 +0100 Received: from tim.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tim.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 30705-07; Thu, 17 May 2012 22:02:47 +0100 (BST) Received: from [192.168.3.10] ([192.168.3.10]) (authenticated bits=0) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q4HL2hsg031513 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 17 May 2012 22:02:45 +0100 Message-ID: <1337288563.7473.24.camel@ted> From: Richard Purdie To: Koen Kooi Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 22:02:43 +0100 In-Reply-To: <0FEE2025-8E84-4CBB-8568-483A55233BD7@dominion.thruhere.net> References: <1337074341-12708-1-git-send-email-koen@dominion.thruhere.net> <1337286572.7473.10.camel@ted> <0FEE2025-8E84-4CBB-8568-483A55233BD7@dominion.thruhere.net> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.2- Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rpsys.net Cc: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert "kmod: Use base_libdir for installing libkmod" X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 21:13:01 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Thu, 2012-05-17 at 22:44 +0200, Koen Kooi wrote: > Op 17 mei 2012 om 22:29 heeft Richard Purdie het volgende geschreven: > > > On Tue, 2012-05-15 at 13:54 -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > >> On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 2:32 AM, Koen Kooi wrote: > >>> The commit breaks pkgconfig and after discussing it with the kmod and udev maintainers the conclusion was reached that putting the libraries in /lib instead of /usr/lib is not supported. > >>> > >>> This reverts commit 6b74f2461735272bd950a4f060dab6e778a36f92. > >> > >> while this is what I had initially it doesn't go well with kmod living in > >> /sbin and accessing libraries from /usr due to our QA checks although > >> I am all for simplifying it where we don't make this check at all. > > > > I've had requests for it along with a commitment to fix it and patches. > > If we decide we don't want this, fine and that will be the case if > > patches are not forthcoming to fix the QA issues. I don't think we've > > reached that point at this with that yet. > > > > I've decided to accept this patch and "unbreak" meta-oe/udev at the > > expense of screwing up OE-Core. I am however still deeply unhappy people > > are trying to bypass OE-Core this way and then "blackmail" OE-Core using > > breaking meta-oe as a reason. The whole systemd thing has been badly > > handled and needs to get fixed properly. > > What does systemd have to do with this? Why does meta-oe has its own udev recipe? Is systemd related to that at all? > This is about a broken commit breaking udev 182 for over a week. OE-Core worked fine and the commit fixes QA warnings which are now back. > If you have issues with systemd, send patches to meta-oe to fix it. Or > at least bug reports that are more than the insinuations above. I looked in the README and followed that to other README files but couldn't find any indication about what to do with bugs other than write patches which I obviously don't have. When will you be sending the patch to fix the QA warning your revert has introduced? Yes this is a rhetorical question since I've seen your view on this problem previously. Cheers, Richard