From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Colin Cross Subject: [PATCH 0/2] bug fixes for coupled cpuidle Date: Fri, 18 May 2012 11:05:22 -0700 Message-ID: <1337364324-12171-1-git-send-email-ccross@android.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-pm-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Errors-To: linux-pm-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org To: Len Brown Cc: Kevin Hilman , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Amit Kucheria , Colin Cross , linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org, Arjan van de Ven , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org The last modifications made to the coupled cpuidle patches introduced two bugs that I missed during testing. The online count was never initialized, causing coupled idle to always wait and never enter the ready loop. That hid the second bug, the ready count could never be decremented after exiting idle. Len, these two patches could be squashed into patch 3 of the original set. If you do squash them, you could also add Rafael's tags to the set (Reviewed-by on 1 and 2, acked-by on 3). Or I can reupload the whole stack as v5 if you prefer. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ccross@android.com (Colin Cross) Date: Fri, 18 May 2012 11:05:22 -0700 Subject: [PATCH 0/2] bug fixes for coupled cpuidle Message-ID: <1337364324-12171-1-git-send-email-ccross@android.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org The last modifications made to the coupled cpuidle patches introduced two bugs that I missed during testing. The online count was never initialized, causing coupled idle to always wait and never enter the ready loop. That hid the second bug, the ready count could never be decremented after exiting idle. Len, these two patches could be squashed into patch 3 of the original set. If you do squash them, you could also add Rafael's tags to the set (Reviewed-by on 1 and 2, acked-by on 3). Or I can reupload the whole stack as v5 if you prefer. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S966357Ab2ERSLs (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 May 2012 14:11:48 -0400 Received: from mail-wi0-f202.google.com ([209.85.212.202]:60439 "EHLO mail-wi0-f202.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758494Ab2ERSLq (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 May 2012 14:11:46 -0400 From: Colin Cross To: Len Brown Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org, Kevin Hilman , Arjan van de Ven , Deepthi Dharwar , Santosh Shilimkar , Daniel Lezcano , Amit Kucheria , Lorenzo Pieralisi , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Colin Cross Subject: [PATCH 0/2] bug fixes for coupled cpuidle Date: Fri, 18 May 2012 11:05:22 -0700 Message-Id: <1337364324-12171-1-git-send-email-ccross@android.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.7.7.3 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org The last modifications made to the coupled cpuidle patches introduced two bugs that I missed during testing. The online count was never initialized, causing coupled idle to always wait and never enter the ready loop. That hid the second bug, the ready count could never be decremented after exiting idle. Len, these two patches could be squashed into patch 3 of the original set. If you do squash them, you could also add Rafael's tags to the set (Reviewed-by on 1 and 2, acked-by on 3). Or I can reupload the whole stack as v5 if you prefer.