From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Chris Wilson Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: consolidate interrupt naming scheme Date: Mon, 21 May 2012 09:46:00 +0100 Message-ID: <1337589967_155276@CP5-2952> References: <1337356929-27188-1-git-send-email-ben@bwidawsk.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from fireflyinternet.com (smtp.fireflyinternet.com [109.228.6.236]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D613B9F02D for ; Mon, 21 May 2012 01:46:14 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1337356929-27188-1-git-send-email-ben@bwidawsk.net> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Cc: Ben Widawsky List-Id: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org On Fri, 18 May 2012 09:02:09 -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote: > here are some opportunities to do things a bit better with the naming of > things now that our hindsight is better. The major problem with this is that it breaks the expectations of the INTEL_ namespace, masquerading per-gen values as fixed constants for all chipsets. -Chris -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre