From: Dario Faggioli <raistlin@linux.it>
To: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com>
Cc: Christoph Egger <Christoph.Egger@amd.com>,
"xen-devel@lists.xen.org" <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] libxl: Introduce LIBXL_DOMAIN_TYPE_INVALID to make gcc happy
Date: Tue, 22 May 2012 16:58:17 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1337698697.20890.5.camel@Abyss> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1337681771.10118.69.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com>
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 906 bytes --]
On Tue, 2012-05-22 at 11:16 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > Well, the patch I'm attaching now let me at least build cleanly,
> > _without_ any other patches (not Christoph's nor mine)... Did you mean
> > something like that?
>
> I did, I guess we need to check that all callers can cope with this new
> return value though?
>
Sure, that was only to be sure I got what you were saying. :-)
What I'm not getting right now is whether or not a proper patch doing
such is still interesting or not? Also, how come am I almost the only
one seeing that issue? Does it relate to gcc version? :-O
Thanks and Regards,
Dario
--
<<This happens because I choose it to happen!>> (Raistlin Majere)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://retis.sssup.it/people/faggioli
Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK)
[-- Attachment #1.2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 126 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-05-22 14:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-05-18 11:24 libxl: build failure due to 'libxl_domain_type' Christoph Egger
2012-05-18 12:21 ` [PATCH] libxl: Introduce LIBXL_DOMAIN_TYPE_INVALID to make gcc happy Christoph Egger
2012-05-18 14:30 ` Dario Faggioli
2012-05-18 14:39 ` Ian Campbell
2012-05-18 14:48 ` Dario Faggioli
2012-05-18 14:55 ` Ian Campbell
2012-05-18 15:07 ` Dario Faggioli
2012-05-22 10:16 ` Ian Campbell
2012-05-22 14:58 ` Dario Faggioli [this message]
2012-05-22 15:07 ` Ian Campbell
2012-05-22 16:18 ` Dario Faggioli
2012-05-23 8:59 ` Christoph Egger
2012-05-23 9:23 ` Dario Faggioli
2012-05-23 9:30 ` Christoph Egger
2012-05-18 15:11 ` Christoph Egger
2012-05-18 15:22 ` Ian Campbell
2012-05-23 10:53 ` Ian Jackson
2012-05-23 11:17 ` Dario Faggioli
2012-05-23 12:37 ` Ian Jackson
2012-05-23 12:49 ` Dario Faggioli
2012-05-23 13:12 ` Dario Faggioli
2012-05-23 13:47 ` Christoph Egger
2012-05-23 14:36 ` Ian Jackson
2012-05-23 15:21 ` Dario Faggioli
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1337698697.20890.5.camel@Abyss \
--to=raistlin@linux.it \
--cc=Christoph.Egger@amd.com \
--cc=Ian.Campbell@citrix.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.