From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from 93-97-173-237.zone5.bethere.co.uk ([93.97.173.237] helo=tim.rpsys.net) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SXocD-0002Cs-0G for bitbake-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Fri, 25 May 2012 09:07:13 +0200 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q4P6v0au031507; Fri, 25 May 2012 07:57:00 +0100 Received: from tim.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tim.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 30513-03; Fri, 25 May 2012 07:56:56 +0100 (BST) Received: from [192.168.3.10] ([192.168.3.10]) (authenticated bits=0) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q4P6uqmf031500 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 25 May 2012 07:56:53 +0100 Message-ID: <1337929012.8248.175.camel@ted> From: Richard Purdie To: Peter Seebach Date: Fri, 25 May 2012 07:56:52 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20120522111359.54be2700@wrlaptop> References: <1337694219.8248.6.camel@ted> <20120522111359.54be2700@wrlaptop> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.2- Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rpsys.net Cc: Chris Larson , bitbake-devel@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: v2 [PATCH 0/2] data_smart.py: Track inclusions and assignments X-BeenThere: bitbake-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 May 2012 07:07:13 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Tue, 2012-05-22 at 11:13 -0500, Peter Seebach wrote: > On Tue, 22 May 2012 14:43:39 +0100 > Richard Purdie wrote: > > > So I want to take a closer look through the patches but I'm leaning > > toward merging them. If we find ways to make things neater, great but > > this is probably as good a start as we can hope for. > > They need one small bug fixed (there's a missing [1] in the mods to > createCopy), but apart from that I'm using them without noticeable > trouble. FWIW, I'm planning to look at this next week, am not likely to get there today. > If these get added to bitbake, there's a related change to oe-core > that might be handy, to suppress sanity checks when using this feature > so you can get an explanation of what went wrong. I suspect a recent change to sanity.bbclass has made that obsolete... Cheers, Richard