From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Chris Wilson Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/14] drm/i915: properly alternate between DVI and HDMI Date: Mon, 28 May 2012 20:53:02 +0100 Message-ID: <1338234808_317824@CP5-2952> References: <1338234182-5021-1-git-send-email-przanoni@gmail.com> <1338234182-5021-3-git-send-email-przanoni@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from fireflyinternet.com (smtp.fireflyinternet.com [109.228.6.236]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60C469E796 for ; Mon, 28 May 2012 12:53:38 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1338234182-5021-3-git-send-email-przanoni@gmail.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org To: Paulo Zanoni , intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Cc: Paulo Zanoni List-Id: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org On Mon, 28 May 2012 16:42:49 -0300, Paulo Zanoni wrote: > This patch adds the code to fix the problem, but it depends on the > removal of some code that can't be removed right now and will come > later in the patch series. The patch that we need is: > - drm/i915: don't write 0 to DIP control at HDMI init I was going to grumble a bit more and ask if these could be split into generational patches so that a bisect doesn't land on a commit affecting them all. However, it sounds like bisecting through this series is going to be problematic anyway... Just to be sure, we are not introducing issues to be resolved in later patches? -Chris -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre