From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga02.intel.com (mga02.intel.com [134.134.136.20]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17CFCE01444; Fri, 1 Jun 2012 14:47:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from orsmga001.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.18]) by orsmga101.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 01 Jun 2012 14:47:15 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.67,352,1309762800"; d="scan'208";a="147168895" Received: from unknown (HELO [10.255.12.175]) ([10.255.12.175]) by orsmga001.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 01 Jun 2012 14:47:14 -0700 From: Tom Zanussi To: Darren Hart In-Reply-To: <4FC93751.4060606@linux.intel.com> References: <4FC009CD.9030201@yoctoproject.org> <4FC7B80E.1020802@linux.intel.com> <4FC83910.9050302@windriver.com> <4FC8FFBC.6060002@linux.intel.com> <1338586414.28421.11.camel@elmorro> <4FC93751.4060606@linux.intel.com> Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2012 16:47:20 -0500 Message-ID: <1338587240.28421.13.camel@elmorro> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.3 Cc: Yocto Project Discussion , yocto-infrastructure@yoctoproject.org Subject: Re: Bugzilla Re-organization X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2012 21:47:16 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Fri, 2012-06-01 at 14:42 -0700, Darren Hart wrote: > > On 06/01/2012 02:33 PM, Tom Zanussi wrote: > > On Fri, 2012-06-01 at 10:45 -0700, Darren Hart wrote: > > >> The other Kernel related path would include > >> Build System & Metadata > >> Layers - OpenEmbedded-Core > >> kernel > >> > >> This would be for the kernel.bbclass and other recipes and classes. > >> > > > > It would be nice to have that fact reflected in the name somehow, to > > avoid confusion for users with Yocto Project Components->Kernel, but I'm > > not coming up with anything wieldy. > > kernel-recipes ? > It doesn't really capture the 'classes' part, but I suppose that would be implied and close enough. Tom > >> So, the final layout would be: > >> > >> Yocto Project Components > >> BSPs > >> bsps-runtime > >> bsps-configuration (these top too being "generic" buckets) > >> bsps-meta-yocto > > > > On the other hand this naming is clean and consistent with the rest, so > > is probably better. > > Ah, but you remind me that we probably also need: > > bsps-oe-core > > > > >> bsps-meta-fsl-ppc > >> bsps-meta-intel > >> bsps-meta-ti > >> bsps-tools > >> bsps-xilinx (meta-xilinx?) > >> > >> Kernel > >> linux-yocto > >> kernel-configuration > >> kernel-tooling > >> > >> I believe this would make it much easier for us to manage Kernel related > >> issues across the project. > >> > > > > I agree. Acked-by-me... > > Great. Michael, the kernel-team is now in agreement. >