From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Gabriel Paubert <paubert@iram.es>
Cc: Wrobel Heinz-R39252 <r39252@freescale.com>,
Michael Ellerman <michael@ellerman.id.au>,
Steffen Rumler <steffen.rumler.ext@nsn.com>,
"linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: kernel panic during kernel module load (powerpc specific part)
Date: Wed, 06 Jun 2012 08:14:55 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1338934495.7150.112.camel@pasglop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120605113225.GA11215@visitor2.iram.es>
On Tue, 2012-06-05 at 13:32 +0200, Gabriel Paubert wrote:
> - gcc-4.6 and gcc-4.7 behave identically, if -Os is set, they
> generate by default lmw/stmw. But if I combine -Os with
> -mno-multiple, they call the helper functions.
>
> In other words, on this system, gcc-4.4 is broken but should not
> cause any harm. gcc-4.6 and gcc-4.7 look correct, but are there
> any processors on which -mno-multiple is worth setting?
It could be an artifact of the -mtune we use, dunno. And yes, I'm pretty
sure some embedded processors don't like multiple load/store.
Cheers,
Ben.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-06-05 22:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-05-30 14:33 kernel panic during kernel module load (powerpc specific part) Steffen Rumler
2012-05-30 23:24 ` Michael Ellerman
2012-05-31 7:04 ` Wrobel Heinz-R39252
2012-05-31 11:04 ` Gabriel Paubert
2012-06-01 9:18 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2012-06-01 11:33 ` Wrobel Heinz-R39252
2012-06-04 7:43 ` Steffen Rumler
2012-06-04 10:53 ` Paul Mackerras
2012-06-04 11:03 ` Gabriel Paubert
2012-06-04 22:00 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2012-06-05 10:44 ` Gabriel Paubert
2012-06-05 22:47 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2012-06-05 11:32 ` Gabriel Paubert
2012-06-05 22:14 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt [this message]
2012-06-06 7:36 ` Steffen Rumler
2012-06-06 11:32 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2012-06-06 14:37 ` [PATCH] " Steffen Rumler
2012-06-21 15:27 ` roger blofeld
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1338934495.7150.112.camel@pasglop \
--to=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=michael@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=paubert@iram.es \
--cc=r39252@freescale.com \
--cc=steffen.rumler.ext@nsn.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.