All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Malcolm Priestley <tvboxspy@gmail.com>
To: Antti Palosaari <crope@iki.fi>
Cc: linux-media <linux-media@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: dvb_usb_v2: use pointers to properties[REGRESSION]
Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2012 19:12:50 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1339870370.1865.37.camel@Route3278> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4FDCABDA.2000000@iki.fi>

On Sat, 2012-06-16 at 18:52 +0300, Antti Palosaari wrote:
> On 06/16/2012 03:06 PM, Malcolm Priestley wrote:
> > On Sat, 2012-06-16 at 04:16 +0300, Antti Palosaari wrote:
> >> I did example for you, here you are :)
> >>
> >> On 06/16/2012 03:55 AM, Antti Palosaari wrote:
> >>> On 06/16/2012 03:35 AM, Malcolm Priestley wrote:
> >>>> On Sat, 2012-06-16 at 01:54 +0300, Antti Palosaari wrote:
> >>>>> Hello Malcolm,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On 06/16/2012 01:11 AM, Malcolm Priestley wrote:
> >>>>>> Hi Antti
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> You can't have dvb_usb_device_properties as constant structure pointer.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> At run time it needs to be copied to a private area.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Having constant structure for properties was one of main idea of whole
> >>>>> change. Earlier it causes some problems when driver changes those values
> >>>>> - for example remote configuration based info from the eeprom.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Two or more devices of the same type on the system will be pointing to
> >>>>>> the same structure.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Yes and no. You can define struct dvb_usb_device_properties for each
> >>>>> USB ID.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Any changes they make to the structure will be common to all.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> For those devices having same USB ID only.
> >>>>> Changing dvb_usb_device_properties is *not* allowed. It is constant and
> >>>>> should be. That was how I designed it. Due to that I introduced those
> >>>>> new callbacks to resolve needed values dynamically.
> >>>> Yes, but it does make run-time tweaks difficult.
> >>>>
> >>>>> If there is still something that is needed to resolve at runtime I am
> >>>>> happy to add new callback. For example PID filter configuration is
> >>>>> static currently as per adapter and if it is needed to to reconfigure at
> >>>>> runtime new callback is needed.
> >>>> I will look at the PID filter later, it defaulted to off.
> >>>>
> >>>> However, in my builds for ARM devices it is defaulted on. I will be
> >>>> testing this later. I can't see any problems.
> >>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Could you say what is your problem I can likely say how to resolve it.
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Well, the problem is, I now need two separate structures for LME2510 and
> >>>> LME2510C as in the existing driver, the hope was to merge them as one.
> >>>> The only difference being the stream endpoint number.
> >>>
> >>> Then you should use .get_usb_stream_config() instead of static stream
> >>> configuration. That is now supported.
> >>>
> >>> I have found one logical error in my current implementation.
> >>> get_usb_stream_config gets frontend as a parameter, but it is called
> >>> frontend == NULL when attaching adapters and after that frontend is real
> >>> value when called (just before streaming is started). Now what happens
> >>> if we has multiple adapters? We cannot know which adapter is requested
> >>> during attach since FE is NULL :)
> >>> But that is problem case only if you have multiple adapters. I will find
> >>> out better solution next few days. It is ugly now.
> >>> You can just skip fe checking or something. See AF9015 for example.
> >>>
> >>>> Currently, it is implemented in identify_state on dvb_usb_v2.
> >>>>
> >>>> The get_usb_stream_config has no access to device to to allow a run-time
> >>>> change there.
> >>>
> >>> Hmmm, what you try to say? As FE is given as a pointer, you have also
> >>> adapter and device. Those are nested, device is root, then adapter is
> >>> under that and finally frontend are under the adapter.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> .
> >>> └── device
> >>>       ├── adapter0
> >>>       │   ├── frontend0
> >>>       │   ├── frontend1
> >>>       │   └── frontend2
> >>>       └── adapter1
> >>>           ├── frontend0
> >>>           ├── frontend1
> >>>           └── frontend2
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> regards
> >>> Antti
> >>
> >> static int lme2510_get_usb_stream_config(struct dvb_frontend *fe,
> >> 		struct usb_data_stream_properties *stream)
> >> {
> >> 	struct dvb_usb_adapter *adap;
> >> 	struct lme2510_state *state;
> >>
> >> 	stream->type = USB_BULK;
> >> 	stream->count = 10;
> >> 	stream->u.bulk.buffersize = 4096;
> >>
> >> // ugly part begins
> >> 	if (fe == NULL)
> >> 		return 0;
> >> 	adap = fe->dvb->priv;
> >> 	state = adap->dev->priv;
> >> // ugly part ends
> >>
> >> 	if (state->chip_id == lme2510c)
> >> 		stream->endpoint = 8;
> >> 	else
> >> 		stream->endpoint = 6;
> >>
> >> 	return 0;
> >> }
> >>
> >> Ugly part between comments is what I am going to change, but currently
> >> it works as is.
> >>
> > This doesn't work because the code will return the stream->endpoint
> > unset and then try to initialise usb_urb_init.
> 
> So what? It happens only once when device is initialized. We do not need 
> to know endpoint at that phase as we do not stream yet.
Please read your code you submit the urbs.

int dvb_usb_adapter_stream_init(struct dvb_usb_adapter *adap)
{
	int ret;
	struct usb_data_stream_properties stream_props;

	adap->stream.udev = adap->dev->udev;
	adap->stream.user_priv = adap;

	/* resolve USB stream configuration for buffer alloc */
	if (adap->dev->props->get_usb_stream_config) {
		ret = adap->dev->props->get_usb_stream_config(NULL,
				&stream_props);
		if (ret < 0)
			return ret;
	} else {
		stream_props = adap->props->stream;
	}

	/* FIXME: can be removed as set later in anyway */
	adap->stream.complete = dvb_usb_data_complete;

	return usb_urb_init(&adap->stream, &stream_props); <<<<----here
}
> 
> > It would be far better to have get_usb_stream_config point to adapter
> > and point to adap->fe[adap->active_fe] inside if need be.
> 
> Why?
Again read your code. why do we need frontend ? ... we want adapter.

Always pointing to same adapter regardless of frontend number.

static int af9015_get_usb_stream_config(struct dvb_frontend *fe,
		struct usb_data_stream_properties *stream)
{
	struct dvb_usb_adapter *adap;

	deb_info("%s: fe=%p\n", __func__, fe);

	stream->type = USB_BULK;
	stream->count = 8;
	stream->endpoint = 0x84;
	stream->u.bulk.buffersize = TS_USB20_FRAME_SIZE;

	if (fe == NULL)
		return 0;

	 adap = fe->dvb->priv; <<< always same adapter

	if (adap->id == 1)
		stream->endpoint = 0x85;

	if (adap->dev->udev->speed == USB_SPEED_FULL)
		stream->u.bulk.buffersize = TS_USB11_FRAME_SIZE;

	return 0;
}

> As we are going to configure stream based _frontend_ current needs we 
> just need to know frontend and nothing more or less. If you pass adapter 
> as a parameter then you don't know what is frontend in question as 
> adapter coould have multiple frontends.
> 
> active_fe member variable is meant to be internal use of DVB USB 
> framework. You should not use it from the driver. You can see active 
> frontend id just looking current frontend id (fe->id).
> 
> > This is also the case with af9015, the code is extracting adapter
> > through another module.
> 
> I don't understand what you mean.
> 
> Also I would like to ask if you test code I given at all?
Yes, system crash. Endpoint not set.
> 
> You seems not to understand that callback - get_usb_stream_config() - is 
> there for configuring stream dynamically.
With get_usb_stream_config as;

	int (*get_usb_stream_config) (struct dvb_usb_adapter *,
			struct usb_data_stream_properties *);


If we really need the frontend we do this.

static int driverxxx_get_usb_stream_config(struct dvb_usb_adapter *adap,
		struct usb_data_stream_properties *stream)
{
	struct dvb_frontend *fe = adap->fe[adap->active_fe];
....

Regards


Malcolm





  reply	other threads:[~2012-06-16 18:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-06-15 22:11 dvb_usb_v2: use pointers to properties[REGRESSION] Malcolm Priestley
2012-06-15 22:54 ` Antti Palosaari
2012-06-16  0:35   ` Malcolm Priestley
2012-06-16  0:55     ` Antti Palosaari
2012-06-16  1:16       ` Antti Palosaari
2012-06-16 12:06         ` Malcolm Priestley
2012-06-16 15:52           ` Antti Palosaari
2012-06-16 18:12             ` Malcolm Priestley [this message]
2012-06-16 18:41               ` Antti Palosaari
2012-06-16 20:17                 ` Malcolm Priestley
2012-06-16 20:27                   ` Antti Palosaari

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1339870370.1865.37.camel@Route3278 \
    --to=tvboxspy@gmail.com \
    --cc=crope@iki.fi \
    --cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.