Re: [PATCH] linux-tools: multilib compilation fix

[Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>]

On Wed, 2012-06-20 at 11:25 +0300, Bogdan Marinescu wrote:
> This patch makes linux-tools compile properly on multilib configurations
> (which failed because of some invalid dependencies). Tested by compiling
> lib32-core-image-sato-sdk.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Bogdan Marinescu <bogdan.a.marinescu@intel.com>
> ---
>  meta/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-tools.inc |    2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/meta/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-tools.inc b/meta/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-tools.inc
> index 3b03c05..048608c 100644
> --- a/meta/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-tools.inc
> +++ b/meta/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-tools.inc
> @@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ do_install_perf[umask] = "022"
>  
>  PERFDEPENDS = "virtual/${MLPREFIX}libc:do_populate_sysroot ${MLPREFIX}elfutils:do_populate_sysroot ${MLPREFIX}binutils:do_populate_sysroot"
>  PERFDEPENDS_libc-uclibc = ""
> -PERFRDEPENDS = "python perl elfutils"
> +PERFRDEPENDS = "${MLPREFIX}python ${MLPREFIX}perl ${MLPREFIX}elfutils"
>  PERFRDEPENDS_libc-uclibc = ""
>  
>  do_compile_perf[depends] = "${PERFDEPENDS}"

Bruce has just totally rearranged this code. Could you check if the new
recipe still suffers from this issue please?

Cheers,

Richard