Re: [xen-unstable test] 13339: regressions - FAIL

[Dario Faggioli <raistlin@linux.it>]

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1317 bytes --]

On Sat, 2012-06-23 at 00:37 +0100, xen.org wrote: 
> Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
> including tests which could not be run:
>  test-amd64-amd64-xl-sedf-pin  9 guest-start               fail REGR. vs. 13025
> 
Ok, that was expected as I guess this run benefited from Ian's patch
which fixed the "wrong domid" issue, but not by mine one fixing the NULL
pointer dereference in the hypervisor the above caused (although I call
it to be sedf's fault! :-P)

Also, it seems the build for flight 13352
(<osstest-13352-mainreport@xen.org>) included both, and the tests pass
(http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/13352/test-amd64-amd64-xl-sedf/info.html) in that case. :-)

> Regressions which are regarded as allowable (not blocking):
>  test-amd64-amd64-xl-sedf      9 guest-start               fail REGR. vs. 13025
>
As above.

> test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-win7-amd64 12 guest-localmigrate/x10 fail like 13025
> 
But what about this? Have we broken migration now?!?! :-O

Thanks and Regards,
Dario

-- 
<<This happens because I choose it to happen!>> (Raistlin Majere)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://retis.sssup.it/people/faggioli
Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK)



[-- Attachment #1.2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 126 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel