From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.pbcl.net ([88.198.119.4] helo=hetzner.pbcl.net) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SjmZY-0004ZK-0Y for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Wed, 27 Jun 2012 09:21:56 +0200 Received: from blundell.swaffham-prior.co.uk ([91.216.112.25] helo=[192.168.114.6]) by hetzner.pbcl.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SjmP2-0004mK-Bm for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Wed, 27 Jun 2012 09:11:04 +0200 Message-ID: <1340780976.2886.1.camel@x121e.pbcl.net> From: Phil Blundell To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2012 08:09:36 +0100 In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.2-1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: bring mipsel support (little endian mode) X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2012 07:21:56 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Wed, 2012-06-27 at 14:25 +0800, Dennis.Yxun wrote: > for mipsel we also have to filter out -march=mips32, previously we > only handle mips (the big endian?) Why isn't mipsel getting the mips overrides? I believe it's meant to. For what it's worth, mipsel (generically; I haven't tried qemu specifically) does seem to work fine for me without this patch. p.