Re: [PATCH] xl: improve the comments for sedf parameters checking

[Dario Faggioli <raistlin@linux.it>]

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1143 bytes --]

On Mon, 2012-07-02 at 11:36 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote: 
> Ian Campbell writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xl: improve the comments for sedf parameters	checking"):
> > On Fri, 2012-06-29 at 17:29 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > > Dario Faggioli writes ("[Xen-devel] [PATCH] xl: improve the comments for sedf parameters checking"):
> > > > As agreed during review of what has become 513d5e196e23.
> > > 
> > > Thanks.  I'm afraid it doesn't apply to tip though.
> > 
> > This code got moved to libxl while we were trying to fixup this stuff
> > and the equivalent to this patch was applied to libxl as part of
> > 25494:836db8c4b9f9 "libxl: fix validation of scheduling parameters for
> > sedf".
> 
Indeed. :-)

> Oh good.
> 
Yep, sorry for not having replied soon, I was on leave from Firday
afternoon to yesterday (included).

Thanks and Regards,
Dario

-- 
<<This happens because I choose it to happen!>> (Raistlin Majere)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://retis.sssup.it/people/faggioli
Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK)



[-- Attachment #1.2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 126 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel