From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from tim.rpsys.net (93-97-173-237.zone5.bethere.co.uk [93.97.173.237]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21499E006AD for ; Thu, 5 Jul 2012 09:12:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q65GC8X1001954; Thu, 5 Jul 2012 17:12:08 +0100 Received: from tim.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tim.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 00976-04; Thu, 5 Jul 2012 17:12:04 +0100 (BST) Received: from [192.168.3.10] ([192.168.3.10]) (authenticated bits=0) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q65GC1fe001948 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 5 Jul 2012 17:12:02 +0100 Message-ID: <1341504720.19821.18.camel@ted> From: Richard Purdie To: Scott Garman Date: Thu, 05 Jul 2012 17:12:00 +0100 In-Reply-To: <4FF5B4EA.5000302@intel.com> References: <4FF5B4EA.5000302@intel.com> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.2- Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rpsys.net Cc: poky@yoctoproject.org Subject: Re: [denzil][PATCH 0/9] bitbake fetch improvements backport to denzil X-BeenThere: poky@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Poky build system developer discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Jul 2012 16:12:10 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Thu, 2012-07-05 at 08:38 -0700, Scott Garman wrote: > On 07/03/2012 03:31 PM, Khem Raj wrote: > > On denzil bitbake was still trying to go out to internet for git repos > > when BB_NO_NETWORK was set. This set of backports fix that issue > > and now BB_NO_NETWORK works as expected > > Hi Khem, > > Denzil 1.2.1 is already in release candidate phase and going through QA. > I'm not sure if we can take this for 1.2.1, it may have to wait for > 1.2.2. Richard should probably weigh in here. Its 1.2.2 material at this point but we should try and get things into the branch sooner than later after release. I am worried about this series introducing bugs. We did have some bugs found in some of the series of fetcher changes I made in master. Cheers, Richard