From: "Anton Antonov" <anton.antonov@arm.com>
To: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] cargo.bbclass: allow to avoid appending PACKAGECONFIG_CONFARGS
Date: Fri, 16 May 2025 09:39:19 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <13420.1747413559731422430@lists.openembedded.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANNYZj8WRTH0He_BcxPt4q5VeHHkG8qyTFHfKL-_LGiuYstxVw@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1176 bytes --]
On Fri, May 16, 2025 at 08:55 AM, Alexander Kanavin wrote:
>
> If you need to supply these
> arguments some other way, then you can follow for example mesa.inc and
> define empty PACKAGECONFIGS:
>
> PACKAGECONFIG[amd] = ""
> PACKAGECONFIG[svga] = ""
> PACKAGECONFIG[virgl] = ""
>
> And then use them to form a custom variable, which you can use as you see
> fit:
>
> GALLIUMDRIVERS:append = "${@bb.utils.contains('PACKAGECONFIG',
> 'gallium-llvm', '${GALLIUMDRIVERS_LLVM}', '', d)}"
> GALLIUMDRIVERS:append = "${@bb.utils.contains('PACKAGECONFIG', 'amd',
> ',r600', '', d)}"
I think using PACKAGECONFIG to define cargo features list is a normal use-case in rust based recipes. With this change is not easily achievable because ${PACKAGECONFIG_CONFARGS} is unquoted in cargo.bbclass and we can't use it with CARGO_BUILD_FLAGS += " --features" if there are more than one feature.
So, if the change is not going to be reverted then we realistically have two options - either complicate the recipes with a lot of conditions like you suggest or just add a comment that oe_cargo_build() is broken in cargo.bbclass and define our own do_compile()
Anton
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1290 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-16 16:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-20 16:55 [PATCH 1/2] cargo.bbclass: show PACKAGECONFIG_CONFARGS in bbnote martin.jansa
2025-03-20 16:55 ` [PATCH 2/2] cargo.bbclass: allow to avoid appending PACKAGECONFIG_CONFARGS martin.jansa
[not found] ` <182E912DEB60EF95.20788@lists.openembedded.org>
2025-03-20 16:59 ` [OE-core] " Martin Jansa
2025-03-20 17:06 ` Richard Purdie
[not found] ` <182E91CCE4A2B275.19116@lists.openembedded.org>
2025-03-20 17:16 ` Richard Purdie
2025-03-20 17:36 ` Martin Jansa
2025-03-20 17:51 ` Jean-Pierre Geslin
2025-03-20 18:11 ` [OE-core] " Jean-Pierre Geslin
2025-03-24 18:55 ` Alexander Kanavin
2025-03-24 19:30 ` Martin Jansa
2025-03-24 22:29 ` Richard Purdie
2025-03-31 16:18 ` akuster808
2025-03-31 16:28 ` Alexander Kanavin
2025-05-16 15:07 ` Anton Antonov
2025-05-16 15:55 ` [OE-core] " Alexander Kanavin
2025-05-16 16:39 ` Anton Antonov [this message]
2025-05-16 17:19 ` Alexander Kanavin
2025-05-16 17:43 ` Marko, Peter
2025-05-16 17:47 ` Anton Antonov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=13420.1747413559731422430@lists.openembedded.org \
--to=anton.antonov@arm.com \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.