From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754014Ab2GZWDL (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Jul 2012 18:03:11 -0400 Received: from merlin.infradead.org ([205.233.59.134]:43468 "EHLO merlin.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753741Ab2GZWDH convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Jul 2012 18:03:07 -0400 Message-ID: <1343340164.32120.21.camel@twins> Subject: Re: [ 028/108] sched/nohz: Rewrite and fix load-avg computation -- again From: Peter Zijlstra To: Ben Hutchings Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, Ingo Molnar , LKML Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2012 00:02:44 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20120726220107.GG1894@decadent.org.uk> References: <20120723010655.768372060@decadent.org.uk> <1343138818.5132.98.camel@deadeye.wl.decadent.org.uk> <1343337937.32120.20.camel@twins> <20120726220107.GG1894@decadent.org.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.2- Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 2012-07-26 at 23:01 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > That's what I thought, so I went ahead with just the one. > Should I queue up the other two for a future 3.2.y update? Yeah, why not..