Re: NUMA TODO-list for xen-devel

[Dario Faggioli <raistlin@linux.it>]

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1094 bytes --]

On Fri, 2012-08-03 at 12:38 +0100, Jan Beulich wrote: 
> >> How about "dom0_mem=node<n> dom0_vcpus=node<n>" as
> >> an extension to the current options?
> > 
> > Yes, that sounds like a good idea. And relatively easy to implement.
> > Maybe a list or a number of nodes (to make it more complicated ;-)
> 
> Oh yes, of course I implied this flexibility. Just wanted to give
> an easy to read example.
> 
Yep, I agree it sounds nice and should be not to hard. I'll update the
Wiki page.

I only have one question, should we try to take IONUMA into account here
as well? I mean, if it turns out that I/O hubs are connected to some
specific node(s), shouldn't we consider pinning/"affining" Dom0 to those
node(s), as it most likely will be responsible for some/most DomUs' I/O?

Thanks and Regards,
Dario

-- 
<<This happens because I choose it to happen!>> (Raistlin Majere)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://retis.sssup.it/people/faggioli
Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK)



[-- Attachment #1.2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 126 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel