From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Chris Wilson Subject: Re: [PATCH] i915: use alloc_ordered_workqueue() instead of explicit UNBOUND w/ max_active = 1 Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2012 08:56:37 +0100 Message-ID: <1345708607_3773@CP5-2952> References: <20120822234057.GR19212@google.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20120822234057.GR19212@google.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: dri-devel-bounces+sf-dri-devel=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org Errors-To: dri-devel-bounces+sf-dri-devel=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org To: Tejun Heo , Daniel Vetter Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org List-Id: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org On Wed, 22 Aug 2012 16:40:57 -0700, Tejun Heo wrote: > This is an equivalent conversion and will ease scheduled removal of > WQ_NON_REENTRANT. > > Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson -Chris -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre