Re: [PATCH] cfg80211: VHT (11ac) Regulatory change

[Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>]

On Fri, 2012-08-24 at 18:38 +0530, Mahesh Palivela wrote:

> > We might need 20MHZ_NOHT or something?
> 
> Yes, I missed that.
> 20MHZ_NOHT in 5G band and legacy operation 2.4G band may be 5MHZ.

We don't support 5/10 MHz (yet anyway), so we don't have to worry about
that.

> > Those shouldn't be necessary, I think? The secondary 80 MHz channel
> > can't have a control channel, it seems, and the width should be the same
> > as well? Plus this is only allowed in 80+80 anyway.

> 11ac d3.0 spec section 8.4.2.10 says
> 
> An operating class for an 80+80 MHz channel bandwidth is expressed by 
> two consecutive Operating/Sub-
> band Sequences, where the first Operating/Subband Sequence field 
> contains an Operating Triplet for an
> 80 MHz Channel Spacing with an 80+ Behavior Limit and the second 
> Operating/Subband Sequence field
> contains an Operating Triplet for an 80 MHz Channel Spacing without an 
> 80+ Behavior Limit.
> 
> so country might allow primary chan to fall in other frequency segment?

Yes, but how's that related to how you specify the channel?

joahnnes