Re: [PATCH 05/19] netfilter: nf_conntrack_ipv6: improve fragmentation handling

[Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>]

On Sun, 2012-08-26 at 23:20 +0200, Patrick McHardy wrote:
> On Wed, 22 Aug 2012, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
> 
> > On Sun, 2012-08-19 at 21:44 +0200, Patrick McHardy wrote:
> >> On Sun, 19 Aug 2012, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
> >>> On Sat, 2012-08-18 at 14:26 +0200, Patrick McHardy wrote:
> > [...]
> >
> >>> Don't I need to load some of the helper modules, or just the
> >>> nf_conntrack_ipv6 module, or perhaps only nf_defrag_ipv6 ?
> >>
> >> Not with the entire patchset, just IPv6 conntrack is enough. Aith IPv6 NAT
> >> the first packet of a connection must always be defragemented, independant
> >> of an assigned helper.
> >
> > When loading "nf_conntrack_ipv6" I run into issues.
> >
> > When sending a fragmented UDP packet.  With these patches, the IPVS
> > stack will no longer see the fragmented packets, but instead see one
> > large SKB.  This will trigger a MTU path check in e.g.
> > ip_vs_dr_xmit_v6() and an ICMPv6 too big packet is send back.
> >
> >  IPVS: ip_vs_dr_xmit_v6(): frag needed
> >
> > Perhaps we could change/fix the MTU check in IPVS?
> > (This would also solve issues I've seen with TSO/GSO frames, hitting
> > this code path).
> 
> I guess this should use the same check as in IPv6 output, check
> whether IP6CB(skb)->max_frag_size is != 0 and > MTU and only send
> an ICMPv6 error in that case.

Hans have (already) proposed this solution:

  if ((!skb->local_df && skb->len > mtu && !skb_is_gso(skb)) ||
      (IP6CB(skb)->frag_max_size && IP6CB(skb)->frag_max_size > mtu)) {

And I have tested it works.
But I'm not sure about, if we really need the "!skb->local_df" check ?


Thus, we should extend you patchset with a patch, that also address the
MTU checks in IPVS.

-- 
Best regards,
  Jesper Dangaard Brouer
  MSc.CS, Sr. Network Kernel Developer at Red Hat
  Author of http://www.iptv-analyzer.org
  LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/brouer