From: Michael Wolf <mjw@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
peterz@infradead.org, mtosatti@redhat.com, glommer@parallels.com,
mingo@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 0/3] Add guest cpu_entitlement reporting
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2012 16:27:00 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1346102820.8623.32.camel@lambeau> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <503BD920.20603@redhat.com>
On Mon, 2012-08-27 at 13:31 -0700, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 08/27/2012 01:23 PM, Michael Wolf wrote:
> > >
> > > How would a guest know what its entitlement is?
> > >
> > >
> >
> > Currently the Admin/management tool setting up the guests will put it on
> > the qemu commandline. From this it is passed via an ioctl to the host.
> > The guest will get the value from the host via a hypercall.
> >
> > In the future the host could try and do some of it automatically in some
> > cases.
>
> Seems to me it's a meaningless value for the guest. Suppose it is
> migrated to a host that is more powerful, and as a result its relative
> entitlement is reduced. The value needs to be adjusted.
This is why I chose to manage the value from the sysctl interface rather
than just have it stored as a value in /proc. Whatever tool was used to
migrate the vm could hopefully adjust the sysctl value on the guest.
>
> This is best taken care of from the host side.
Not sure what you are getting at here. If you are running in a cloud
environment, you purchase a VM with the understanding that you are
getting certain resources. As this type of user I don't believe you
have any access to the host to see this type of information. So the
user still wouldnt have a way to confirm that they are receiving what
they should be in the way of processor resources.
Would you please elaborate a little more on this?
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-08-27 21:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-08-23 23:14 [PATCH RFC 0/3] Add guest cpu_entitlement reporting Michael Wolf
2012-08-23 23:14 ` [PATCH RFC 1/3] Add a sysctl interface to control and report the cpu entitlement setting Michael Wolf
2012-08-23 23:14 ` [PATCH RFC 2/3] Add a hypercall to retrieve the cpu entitlement value from the host Michael Wolf
2012-08-23 23:14 ` [PATCH RFC 3/3] Modify the amount of stealtime that the kernel reports via the /proc interface Michael Wolf
2012-08-24 4:53 ` [PATCH RFC 0/3] Add guest cpu_entitlement reporting Glauber Costa
2012-08-24 15:11 ` Michael Wolf
2012-08-25 23:36 ` Glauber Costa
2012-08-27 15:50 ` Michael Wolf
2012-08-27 18:50 ` Glauber Costa
2012-08-27 20:19 ` Michael Wolf
2012-08-27 20:51 ` Glauber Costa
2012-08-27 18:55 ` Avi Kivity
2012-08-27 20:23 ` Michael Wolf
2012-08-27 20:31 ` Avi Kivity
2012-08-27 21:27 ` Michael Wolf [this message]
2012-08-27 21:41 ` Glauber Costa
2012-08-27 21:53 ` Michael Wolf
2012-08-27 21:52 ` Avi Kivity
2012-08-28 16:01 ` Anthony Liguori
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1346102820.8623.32.camel@lambeau \
--to=mjw@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=glommer@parallels.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.