From: Chema Gonzalez <chema@google.com>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>, edumazet@google.com
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Chema Gonzalez <chema@berkeley.edu>,
Chema Gonzalez <chema@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH] net: small bug on rxhash calculation
Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2012 16:40:51 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1347061251-2019-2-git-send-email-chema@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1347061251-2019-1-git-send-email-chema@google.com>
In the current rxhash calculation function, while the
sorting of the ports/addrs is coherent (you get the
same rxhash for packets sharing the same 4-tuple, in
both directions), ports and addrs are sorted
independently. This implies packets from a connection
between the same addresses but crossed ports hash to
the same rxhash.
For example, traffic between A=S:l and B=L:s is hashed
(in both directions) from {L, S, {s, l}}. The same
rxhash is obtained for packets between C=S:s and D=L:l.
This patch ensures that you either swap both addrs and ports,
or you swap none. Traffic between A and B, and traffic
between C and D, get their rxhash from different sources
({L, S, {l, s}} for A<->B, and {L, S, {s, l}} for C<->D)
The patch is co-written with Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Chema Gonzalez <chema@google.com>
---
net/core/dev.c | 11 ++++++-----
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
index b1e6d63..dcc673d 100644
--- a/net/core/dev.c
+++ b/net/core/dev.c
@@ -2655,15 +2655,16 @@ void __skb_get_rxhash(struct sk_buff *skb)
if (!skb_flow_dissect(skb, &keys))
return;
- if (keys.ports) {
- if ((__force u16)keys.port16[1] < (__force u16)keys.port16[0])
- swap(keys.port16[0], keys.port16[1]);
+ if (keys.ports)
skb->l4_rxhash = 1;
- }
/* get a consistent hash (same value on both flow directions) */
- if ((__force u32)keys.dst < (__force u32)keys.src)
+ if (((__force u32)keys.dst < (__force u32)keys.src) ||
+ (((__force u32)keys.dst == (__force u32)keys.src) &&
+ ((__force u16)keys.port16[1] < (__force u16)keys.port16[0]))) {
swap(keys.dst, keys.src);
+ swap(keys.port16[0], keys.port16[1]);
+ }
hash = jhash_3words((__force u32)keys.dst,
(__force u32)keys.src,
--
1.7.7.3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-09-07 23:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-09-06 6:35 [PATCH] net: Small bug on rxhash calculation Chema Gonzalez
2012-09-06 6:42 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-09-07 16:57 ` David Miller
2012-09-07 23:40 ` [PATCH] net: small " Chema Gonzalez
2012-09-07 23:40 ` Chema Gonzalez [this message]
2012-09-07 23:50 ` David Miller
2012-09-08 0:24 ` Chema Gonzalez
2012-09-08 8:18 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-09-08 22:43 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1347061251-2019-2-git-send-email-chema@google.com \
--to=chema@google.com \
--cc=chema@berkeley.edu \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.