From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.pbcl.net ([88.198.119.4] helo=hetzner.pbcl.net) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TAmPX-0002V8-Cg for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Sun, 09 Sep 2012 20:39:11 +0200 Received: from blundell.swaffham-prior.co.uk ([91.216.112.25] helo=[192.168.114.6]) by hetzner.pbcl.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TAloA-0007rF-Vs; Sun, 09 Sep 2012 20:00:40 +0200 Message-ID: <1347213501.4396.262.camel@x121e.pbcl.net> From: Phil Blundell To: Khem Raj Date: Sun, 09 Sep 2012 18:58:21 +0100 In-Reply-To: References: <1347187725.4396.259.camel@x121e.pbcl.net> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.4.3-1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] shadow-native: Ensure that ${sbindir} and ${base_sbindir} are respected X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 09 Sep 2012 18:39:11 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Sun, 2012-09-09 at 08:35 -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > On Sun, Sep 9, 2012 at 3:48 AM, Phil Blundell wrote: > > These values need to be passed on the command line to "make install" otherwise > > shadow will use its own built-in idea of where those directories are located. > > > > why would we care for it in a native recipe. Because the binaries won't get staged into the sysroot if they are in the wrong place. p.