All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"mingo@elte.hu" <mingo@elte.hu>,
	"ak@linux.intel.com" <ak@linux.intel.com>,
	Robert Richter <robert.richter@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [BUG] perf: multiplexing and hotplug CPU problem
Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2012 16:47:12 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1347461232.15764.45.camel@twins> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CABPqkBSemt4hsoFfGkm3pac+R+aUJ6Kd9LBTWM-JtKMOF4VM9Q@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, 2012-09-12 at 16:40 +0200, Stephane Eranian wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> As I was debugging my hrtimer patch, I ran a few tests
> with hotplug CPU. In others words, I offline a CPU while
> there is an active monitoring session which causes multiplexing.
> 
> When the CPU goes down, all is well. But when it comes back,
> things go wrong. No kernel crashes but wrong results and multiplexing
> does not work anymore.
> 
> I investigated this some more and found out there is an issue
> on re-activation.
> 
> During shutdown, system-wide events are scheduled out AND removed
> from the event lists. Consequently, ctx->nr_events and ctx->nr_active
> go to zero.
> 
> When the CPU is brought back online and tools do start/stop on the events
> they can be scheduled back in, and therefore increment ctx->nr_active.
> Because list_add_event() is not called again, you may end up with
> ctx->nr_events < ctx->nr_active which is wrong. Events may not
> be a lists and therefore they cannot get multiplexed again.
> 
> It is not clear to me why we need to remove the events from any
> list (list_del_event) when the CPU goes down.
> 
> Why isn't calling event_sched_out() enough?
> If events are kept on lists, why not try to schedule them back in when
> the CPU is brought back online?

This might be never, I think we should put the events in error state
instead of disabling them, that should avoid the re-activation and
provide a stronger hint to userspace that something went funny.

  reply	other threads:[~2012-09-12 14:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-09-12 14:40 [BUG] perf: multiplexing and hotplug CPU problem Stephane Eranian
2012-09-12 14:47 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2012-09-12 14:50   ` Stephane Eranian

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1347461232.15764.45.camel@twins \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=eranian@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=robert.richter@amd.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.