From: Chris Mason <mason@suse.com>
To: linux-lvm@sistina.com
Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] Lock patch
Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2001 13:20:32 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1348330000.1002820832@tiny> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20011011184323.A20226@brightstar.swin.de>
On Thursday, October 11, 2001 06:43:23 PM +0200 wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Will there be a VFS lock patch for 2.4.12? The patch for 2.4.9 doesn't
> work with kernels > 2.4.10
I'd like to clean this up a little so the extra semaphore isn't required,
but it does work. There's an extra hunk tacked onto the end that you'll
need for reiserfs.
-chris
Index: 0.22/fs/super.c
--- 0.22/fs/super.c Tue, 09 Oct 2001 09:52:53 -0400 root (linux/d/45_super.c 1.1.2.1.3.1 644)
+++ 0.23/fs/super.c Tue, 09 Oct 2001 09:59:03 -0400 root (linux/d/45_super.c 1.1.2.1.3.2 644)
@@ -54,6 +54,8 @@
LIST_HEAD(super_blocks);
spinlock_t sb_lock = SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED;
+static DECLARE_MUTEX(lockfs_sem);
+
/*
* Handling of filesystem drivers list.
* Rules:
@@ -322,6 +324,19 @@
sb->s_op->write_super(sb);
unlock_super(sb);
}
+
+static inline void write_super_lockfs(struct super_block *sb)
+{
+ lock_super(sb);
+ if (sb->s_root && sb->s_op) {
+ if (sb->s_dirt && sb->s_op->write_super)
+ sb->s_op->write_super(sb);
+ if (sb->s_op->write_super_lockfs) {
+ sb->s_op->write_super_lockfs(sb);
+ }
+ }
+ unlock_super(sb);
+}
/*
* Note: check the dirty flag before waiting, so we don't
@@ -357,6 +372,39 @@
spin_unlock(&sb_lock);
}
+/*
+ * Note: don't check the dirty flag before waiting, we want the lock
+ * to happen every time this is called. dev must be non-zero
+ */
+void sync_supers_lockfs(kdev_t dev)
+{
+ struct super_block * sb;
+
+ down(&lockfs_sem);
+ if (dev) {
+ sb = get_super(dev);
+ if (sb) {
+ write_super_lockfs(sb);
+ drop_super(sb);
+ }
+ }
+}
+
+void unlockfs(kdev_t dev)
+{
+ struct super_block * sb;
+
+ if (dev) {
+ sb = get_super(dev);
+ if (sb) {
+ if (sb->s_op && sb->s_op->unlockfs)
+ sb->s_op->unlockfs(sb) ;
+ drop_super(sb);
+ }
+ }
+ up(&lockfs_sem);
+}
+
/**
* get_super - get the superblock of a device
* @dev: device to get the superblock for
@@ -578,6 +626,7 @@
if (!s)
goto out1;
down_write(&s->s_umount);
+ down(&lockfs_sem) ;
error = -EBUSY;
restart:
@@ -590,11 +639,13 @@
if (old->s_type != fs_type ||
((flags ^ old->s_flags) & MS_RDONLY)) {
spin_unlock(&sb_lock);
+ up(&lockfs_sem);
put_super(s);
goto out1;
}
if (!grab_super(old))
goto restart;
+ up(&lockfs_sem);
put_super(s);
blkdev_put(bdev, BDEV_FS);
path_release(&nd);
@@ -615,6 +666,9 @@
if (!fs_type->read_super(s, data, 0))
goto out_fail;
unlock_super(s);
+
+ up(&lockfs_sem);
+
get_filesystem(fs_type);
path_release(&nd);
return s;
@@ -728,6 +782,7 @@
sb->s_count -= S_BIAS;
spin_unlock(&sb_lock);
+ down(&lockfs_sem);
down_write(&sb->s_umount);
lock_kernel();
sb->s_root = NULL;
@@ -744,6 +799,7 @@
if (sop->put_super)
sop->put_super(sb);
}
+ up(&lockfs_sem);
/* Forget any remaining inodes */
if (invalidate_inodes(sb)) {
Index: 0.22/fs/buffer.c
--- 0.22/fs/buffer.c Tue, 09 Oct 2001 09:52:53 -0400 root (linux/i/46_buffer.c 1.1.2.1.8.1 644)
+++ 0.23/fs/buffer.c Tue, 09 Oct 2001 09:59:03 -0400 root (linux/i/46_buffer.c 1.1.2.1.8.2 644)
@@ -359,6 +359,34 @@
fsync_dev(dev);
}
+int fsync_dev_lockfs(kdev_t dev)
+{
+ /* you are not allowed to try locking all the filesystems
+ ** on the system, your chances of getting through without
+ ** total deadlock are slim to none.
+ */
+ if (!dev)
+ return fsync_dev(dev) ;
+
+ sync_buffers(dev, 0);
+
+ lock_kernel();
+ /* note, the FS might need to start transactions to
+ ** sync the inodes, or the quota, no locking until
+ ** after these are done
+ */
+ sync_inodes(dev);
+ DQUOT_SYNC(dev);
+ /* if inodes or quotas could be dirtied during the
+ ** sync_supers_lockfs call, the FS is responsible for getting
+ ** them on disk, without deadlocking against the lock
+ */
+ sync_supers_lockfs(dev) ;
+ unlock_kernel();
+
+ return sync_buffers(dev, 1) ;
+}
+
asmlinkage long sys_sync(void)
{
fsync_dev(0);
Index: 0.22/drivers/md/lvm.c
--- 0.22/drivers/md/lvm.c Tue, 09 Oct 2001 09:56:26 -0400 root (linux/i/c/30_lvm.c 1.1.2.1.3.1 644)
+++ 0.23/drivers/md/lvm.c Tue, 09 Oct 2001 09:59:03 -0400 root (linux/i/c/30_lvm.c 1.1.2.1.3.2 644)
@@ -221,9 +221,6 @@
#define DEVICE_OFF(device)
#define LOCAL_END_REQUEST
-/* lvm_do_lv_create calls fsync_dev_lockfs()/unlockfs() */
-/* #define LVM_VFS_ENHANCEMENT */
-
#include <linux/config.h>
#include <linux/module.h>
#include <linux/kernel.h>
@@ -2129,12 +2126,8 @@
if (lv_ptr->lv_access & LV_SNAPSHOT) {
lv_t *org = lv_ptr->lv_snapshot_org, *last;
- /* sync the original logical volume */
- fsync_dev(org->lv_dev);
-#ifdef LVM_VFS_ENHANCEMENT
/* VFS function call to sync and lock the filesystem */
fsync_dev_lockfs(org->lv_dev);
-#endif
down_write(&org->lv_lock);
org->lv_access |= LV_SNAPSHOT_ORG;
@@ -2159,11 +2152,9 @@
else
set_device_ro(lv_ptr->lv_dev, 1);
-#ifdef LVM_VFS_ENHANCEMENT
/* VFS function call to unlock the filesystem */
if (lv_ptr->lv_access & LV_SNAPSHOT)
unlockfs(lv_ptr->lv_snapshot_org->lv_dev);
-#endif
lvm_gendisk.part[MINOR(lv_ptr->lv_dev)].de = lvm_fs_create_lv(vg_ptr, lv_ptr);
return 0;
Index: 0.22/kernel/ksyms.c
--- 0.22/kernel/ksyms.c Tue, 09 Oct 2001 09:52:53 -0400 root (linux/n/c/22_ksyms.c 1.1.2.1.8.1 644)
+++ 0.23/kernel/ksyms.c Tue, 09 Oct 2001 09:59:03 -0400 root (linux/n/c/22_ksyms.c 1.1.2.1.8.2 644)
@@ -178,6 +178,8 @@
EXPORT_SYMBOL(invalidate_inode_pages);
EXPORT_SYMBOL(truncate_inode_pages);
EXPORT_SYMBOL(fsync_dev);
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(fsync_dev_lockfs);
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(unlockfs);
EXPORT_SYMBOL(fsync_no_super);
EXPORT_SYMBOL(permission);
EXPORT_SYMBOL(vfs_permission);
Index: 0.22/include/linux/fs.h
--- 0.22/include/linux/fs.h Tue, 09 Oct 2001 09:52:53 -0400 root (linux/f/d/9_fs.h 1.1.2.1.9.1 644)
+++ 0.23/include/linux/fs.h Tue, 09 Oct 2001 09:59:03 -0400 root (linux/f/d/9_fs.h 1.1.2.1.9.2 644)
@@ -1183,6 +1183,7 @@
extern int sync_buffers(kdev_t, int);
extern void sync_dev(kdev_t);
extern int fsync_dev(kdev_t);
+extern int fsync_dev_lockfs(kdev_t);
extern int fsync_super(struct super_block *);
extern int fsync_no_super(kdev_t);
extern void sync_inodes_sb(struct super_block *);
@@ -1194,6 +1195,8 @@
extern void filemap_fdatasync(struct address_space *);
extern void filemap_fdatawait(struct address_space *);
extern void sync_supers(kdev_t);
+extern void sync_supers_lockfs(kdev_t);
+extern void unlockfs(kdev_t);
extern int bmap(struct inode *, int);
extern int notify_change(struct dentry *, struct iattr *);
extern int permission(struct inode *, int);
--- linux-2.4.4.tmp/fs/reiserfs/super.c Mon Apr 30 16:01:29 2001
+++ linux-2.4.4.SuSE/fs/reiserfs/super.c Mon Apr 30 16:02:13 2001
@@ -80,7 +80,7 @@
reiserfs_prepare_for_journal(s, SB_BUFFER_WITH_SB(s), 1);
journal_mark_dirty(&th, s, SB_BUFFER_WITH_SB (s));
reiserfs_block_writes(&th) ;
- journal_end(&th, s, 1) ;
+ journal_end_sync(&th, s, 1) ;
}
s->s_dirt = dirty;
unlock_kernel() ;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-10-11 17:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-10-11 16:43 [linux-lvm] Lock patch
2001-10-11 17:20 ` Chris Mason [this message]
2001-10-12 7:33 ` Patrick Caulfield
2001-10-12 13:44 ` Julian Einwag
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-09-14 6:00 [linux-lvm] Lock Patch IT3 Stuart B. Tener, USNR-R
2001-09-14 8:55 ` Patrick Caulfield
2001-09-14 11:10 ` IT3 Stuart B. Tener, USNR-R
2001-09-14 11:41 ` Heinz J . Mauelshagen
2001-09-14 11:55 ` svetljo
2001-09-14 16:28 ` IT3 Stuart B. Tener, USNR-R
2001-09-14 18:17 ` svetljo
2001-09-14 21:21 ` IT3 Stuart B. Tener, USNR-R
2001-09-14 22:05 ` svetljo
2001-09-15 0:27 ` IT3 Stuart B. Tener, USNR-R
2001-09-14 22:12 ` svetljo
2001-09-15 0:27 ` IT3 Stuart B. Tener, USNR-R
2001-09-15 2:06 ` svetljo
2001-09-14 16:25 ` IT3 Stuart B. Tener, USNR-R
2001-09-14 13:51 ` Chris Mason
2001-09-14 16:32 ` IT3 Stuart B. Tener, USNR-R
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1348330000.1002820832@tiny \
--to=mason@suse.com \
--cc=linux-lvm@sistina.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.