From: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Phil Blundell <philb@gnu.org>
Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] autotools: Remove special handling for autoconf* and automake*
Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2012 11:17:55 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1348481875.4654.9.camel@ted> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1348330688.4444.217.camel@x121e.pbcl.net>
On Sat, 2012-09-22 at 17:18 +0100, Phil Blundell wrote:
> For reasons that are now shrouded in obscurity, autotools.bbclass
> has long contained a special heuristic to avoid attempting to run
> autoreconf when building autoconf or automake themselves. However,
> the wildcard test against PN which is used there is problematic when
> trying to build another package whose name happens to start with
> "autoconf", and in any case it is silly to do this test at runtime
> for every package. The individual recipes for autoconf and automake
> can just as easily suppress the behaviour that they don't want by
> providing a custom do_configure() method which just runs configure.
>
> Signed-off-by: Phil Blundell <pb@pbcl.net>
> ---
> meta/classes/autotools.bbclass | 158 ++++++++++-----------
> meta/recipes-devtools/autoconf/autoconf.inc | 4 +
> meta/recipes-devtools/autoconf/autoconf_2.69.bb | 2 +-
> meta/recipes-devtools/automake/automake.inc | 4 +
> meta/recipes-devtools/automake/automake_1.12.3.bb | 2 +-
> 5 files changed, 85 insertions(+), 85 deletions(-)
Merged to master, thanks.
Richard
prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-09-24 10:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-09-22 16:18 [PATCH] autotools: Remove special handling for autoconf* and automake* Phil Blundell
2012-09-22 18:58 ` Chris Larson
2012-09-24 10:17 ` Richard Purdie [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1348481875.4654.9.camel@ted \
--to=richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
--cc=philb@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.