From: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@gnu.org>
To: Karel Zak <kzak@redhat.com>
Cc: Petr Uzel <petr.uzel@suse.cz>, util-linux <util-linux@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] fdisk: add guid
Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2012 13:24:11 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1348485851.2456.13.camel@offbook> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120924084323.GA22639@x2.net.home>
On Mon, 2012-09-24 at 10:43 +0200, Karel Zak wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 10:20:58AM +0200, Karel Zak wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 11:04:51AM -0400, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
> > > On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 04:38:16PM +0200, Karel Zak wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 09:05:43AM -0400, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
> > > > > I honestly don't see much difference between doing it before or
> > > > > after GPT, since all the other labels need to be adapted anyway.
> > > >
> > > > I see a difference. Why we need struct fdisk_guid in struct where we
> > > > define DOS partition types? Why there is {0} everywhere?
> > > > Do you want to remove all these changes later?
> > >
> > > My idea of having a unique systypes structure for all labels is for simplicity.
> > > I agree, using {0} isn't the best approach, so it would obviously go out, in favor
> > > of the same one the other labels would use. So if DOS doesn't need the GUID it just
> > > won't use it (and just call ->type or ->name), but it would still be there for those
> > > that do require it, like GPT.
> >
> > Maybe we can use strings.
>
> I mean strings for UUIDs, for DOS we can keep integers there.
>
>
> > struct fdisk_parttype {
>
> unsigned int code;
>
> > const char *type; /* UUID, 0xNN, ... */
> > const char *description; /* help string */
+ int visibility;
> > };
One more thing. We also need a way of hiding parttypes from labels that
don't use them. I was thinking on using a similar approach we have with
the expert and common menus, just bitmasking the label types.
{0x8200, "0657FD6D-A4AB-43C4-84E5-0933C84B4F4F", N_("Linux Swap"), ANY_LABEL }
> >
> > The fdisk dialogs and menus are always based on strings and the final
> > conversion to label specific type (int or GUID) may be done in label
> > specific functions (like add_partition or so).
>
> I'll try to prepare a patch... it's the best way how to explain any
> idea :-)
>
> Karel
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-09-24 11:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-08-21 12:03 [PATCH 1/3] fdisk: add guid Davidlohr Bueso
2012-09-21 11:12 ` Karel Zak
2012-09-21 11:25 ` Petr Uzel
2012-09-21 13:05 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2012-09-21 14:38 ` Karel Zak
2012-09-21 15:04 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2012-09-24 8:20 ` Karel Zak
2012-09-24 8:43 ` Karel Zak
2012-09-24 11:14 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2012-09-24 11:24 ` Davidlohr Bueso [this message]
2012-09-24 11:16 ` Davidlohr Bueso
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1348485851.2456.13.camel@offbook \
--to=dave@gnu.org \
--cc=kzak@redhat.com \
--cc=petr.uzel@suse.cz \
--cc=util-linux@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.