From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from db3outboundpool.messaging.microsoft.com (db3ehsobe002.messaging.microsoft.com [213.199.154.140]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "mail.global.frontbridge.com", Issuer "Microsoft Secure Server Authority" (not verified)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 12E5F2C008A for ; Tue, 25 Sep 2012 10:51:02 +1000 (EST) Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2012 19:50:51 -0500 From: Scott Wood Subject: Re: Probing for native availability of isel from userspace To: malc References: <1348530909.25867.29@snotra> <1348533123.1132.102.camel@pasglop> In-Reply-To: (from av1474@comtv.ru on Mon Sep 24 19:47:28 2012) Message-ID: <1348534251.25867.34@snotra> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; delsp=Yes; format=Flowed Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, hollis@penguinppc.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On 09/24/2012 07:47:28 PM, malc wrote: > On Tue, 25 Sep 2012, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: >=20 > > On Mon, 2012-09-24 at 18:55 -0500, Scott Wood wrote: > > > The ISA says that isel is "Category: Phased-In (sV2.06)" -- are =20 > there > > > any 2.06 chips that don't have it? > > > > I believe "malc" is interested in knowing about pre-2.06 chips that =20 > have > > it. > > >=20 > That too, but also what 's' prefix means. I think it's trying to say that it's phased-in for server but mandatory =20 for embedded, though I don't see that exact notation used anywhere else =20 in the document. -Scott=