From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from list by lists.gnu.org with archive (Exim 4.71) id 1TGwGA-0006D3-Jd for mharc-grub-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 14:22:58 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:35470) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TGwG2-00068m-QF for grub-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 14:22:56 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TGwFy-000174-Sf for grub-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 14:22:50 -0400 Received: from mail-lb0-f169.google.com ([209.85.217.169]:38020) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TGwFy-00016n-Kn for grub-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 14:22:46 -0400 Received: by lbok6 with SMTP id k6so2313197lbo.0 for ; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 11:22:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:subject:from:to:date:in-reply-to:references:content-type :x-mailer:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=UuevmfTk9oSJW3TnOpiVRd05iKhMqliPQ9h+7/5PZi8=; b=VLGBEtSesAkbn/fn4w7jPiB8dXL5ZtTNR+YJ6tCy707rnmFF8EUntbT9+ElJYJ3nRC nc9OWsx6jBC+Pyw3/VBWpd0SZ0vdFDkCAIgZiHFKseWLcyMMKaBmZYrmUlWPHpWT/+Rz tcuGVsYmFqxITyqoO6XxdEBk8C8ue53E0Fb26DrFwvQmLuDWKgIvoyK05crrM65rqkBV L+IeTj9aRXt8tZ5tKjAt1oUDYAwDCJT034fo15TIFgi0wgYbIu3mcS2HOZ8BeOyVY69o fMKTASdF/9TGJWhH9TBcE1A3SVheSaYBIOpgsRSrQHxhmoPRUOljxq5sAmISNXwQKdNQ hbiQ== Received: by 10.152.105.236 with SMTP id gp12mr1263046lab.35.1348683765556; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 11:22:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.10.142] ([83.237.11.186]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id pz9sm1097189lab.11.2012.09.26.11.22.43 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 26 Sep 2012 11:22:44 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1348683759.1735.4.camel@opensuse.site> Subject: Re: [2.00] grub-install use on UEFI system? From: Andrey Borzenkov To: The development of GNU GRUB Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2012 22:22:39 +0400 In-Reply-To: <10BDB000-AA1A-4445-9FD7-A5E1BECA4A48@colorremedies.com> References: <2454CB9A-1CA0-4A60-95E8-10CF0A1975EB@colorremedies.com> <50629EE1.1080000@gmail.com> <5062C6E7.5050603@gmail.com> <98A9D87A-00D2-4F55-8A1D-ED0B5023F87A@colorremedies.com> <506338A0.7090701@gmail.com> <10BDB000-AA1A-4445-9FD7-A5E1BECA4A48@colorremedies.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.4.4 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 209.85.217.169 X-BeenThere: grub-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: The development of GNU GRUB List-Id: The development of GNU GRUB List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2012 18:22:56 -0000 В Ср., 26/09/2012 в 12:08 -0600, Chris Murphy пишет: > On Sep 26, 2012, at 11:17 AM, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko wrote: > > > No. It just means that DIR has to be the ESP mountpoint. IT doesn't > > imply anything about where the .efi effectively lands. > > That's the problem. The help for --boot-directory makes it clear where it will land. The entry for --efi-directory leaves it up to the imagination. > One problem is, where it lands depends on whether it is removable install or not and whether distributor is set or not. How you describe it in single help line? It rather belongs to grub documentation. -andrey