From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:46155) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1THguc-0001Pd-HJ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 28 Sep 2012 16:11:51 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1THgub-0007yq-Cu for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 28 Sep 2012 16:11:50 -0400 Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2012 15:11:32 -0500 From: Scott Wood References: <1345683341-8236-1-git-send-email-scottwood@freescale.com> <1345683341-8236-2-git-send-email-scottwood@freescale.com> <40EA313F-26F0-4065-BD2B-C114FF2AFCB4@suse.de> <20120928195213.GG26688@belle.intranet.vanheusden.com> In-Reply-To: <20120928195213.GG26688@belle.intranet.vanheusden.com> (from folkert@vanheusden.com on Fri Sep 28 14:52:15 2012) Message-ID: <1348863092.5580.19@snotra> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; delsp=Yes; format=Flowed Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-ppc] [PATCH 2/2] PPC: e500: calculate initrd_base like dt_base List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: folkert Cc: qemu-ppc@nongnu.org, Alexander Graf , qemu-devel@nongnu.org On 09/28/2012 02:52:15 PM, folkert wrote: > On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 09:49:08AM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote: > > > While investigating dtb pad issues, I noticed that initrd_base =20 > wasn't taking > > > loadaddr into account the way dt_base was. This seems wrong. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Scott Wood > > > > Ah, all the images I tested start off from address 0. But yes, we =20 > should add the kernel load offset as well. > > Thanks, applied to ppc-next. >=20 > Isn't the aix kernel starting at offset 16384? I doubt the AIX kernel will run on e500. :-) -Scott=